Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Binu Dutta vs The State Bank Of India And 4 Ors on 9 January, 2020

Author: Suman Shyam

Bench: Suman Shyam, Hitesh Kumar Sarma

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010286302019




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C) 8773/2019

            1:BINU DUTTA
            W/O- LATE KALYAN DUTTA, FLAT NO. G-2, 2ND FLOOR, HOUSE NO. 20,
            RAJAT KAMAL PATH, RGB ROAD, GUWAHATI-24.

            VERSUS

            1:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
            REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, RETAIL ASSETS CENTRAL
            PROCESSING CENTER.

            2:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA
             REP. BY ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
             RACPC
             GUWAHATI.

            3:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA
             REP. BY CHIEF MANAGER
             RACPC
             GUWAHATI

            4:STATE BANK OF INDIA
             NEW GUWAHATI BRANCH
             REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER RETAIL ASSETS CENTRAL PROCESSING
            CENTRE (RACPC)
             SWAGOTA SQUARE
             4TH FLOOR
            ABC POINT
             GUWAHATI-5.

            5:THE RECOVERY OFFICER
             DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
             GUWAHAT

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P K GOSWAMI
                                                                                 Page No.# 2/2


Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K K NANDI




                                     BEFORE
                       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA

                                          ORDER

Date : 09-01-2020 Suman Shyam, J Heard Mr. R.S. Ronghang, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. We have also heard Ms. S. Dey, learned counsel who has entered appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 by filing vakalatnama yesterday and has prayed for 02 weeks time to obtain instruction.

Respondent No. 5 is the Recovery Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Therefore, the presence of the said respondent would not be necessary at this stage.

On the request of Ms. Dey, Registry to list this case again after 02 weeks, by reflecting the name of learned counsel for both parties in the cause list.

                                  JUDGE                                      JUDGE
GS


Comparing Assistant