Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Gujarat High Court

Commissioner Of Income Tax ­ vs Amit K. Jain Alias Anil K.Jain ­ ... on 12 December, 2007

Author: J.C.Upadhyaya

Bench: J.C.Upadhyaya

TAXAP/243/2007                                  1/2                                            ORDER



           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                       TAX APPEAL No. 243 of 2007
                                With 
                       TAX APPEAL No. 244 of 2007
======================================
             COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ­ Appellant(s)
                                Versus
             AMIT K. JAIN ALIAS ANIL K.JAIN ­ Opponent(s)
====================================== 
Appearance :
MR MANISH R BHATT for Appellant(s) : 1,
None for Opponent(s) : 1,
======================================
              CORAM :  HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Y.R.MEENA
                       and
                       HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
                           Date : 12/12/2007 
                                        ORAL ORDER 

Heard learned Counsel for the appellant. The Appeals are admitted in terms of the following common questions:­  "[A] Whether   the   Appellate   Tribunal   is   right   in   law   and   on   facts   in canceling   the     assessment   order   framed   by     the     Assessing Officer,  without   going   in   to  the merits,   on   the  ground   that  the   Assessing  Officer  had issued  notice u/s.158 BC to the assessee  to file   the   return   within   15   days   from   the   date   of   service   of   notice?"

[B] Whether   the   Appellate   Tribunal   is   right   in   law   and   on   facts   in canceling   the   assessment   order   despite   the   fact   that   the   word "within   15   days"   in   the   notice   u/s.158BC   issued   by   Assessing Officer   is   a   mere   typographical   error   and   even   otherwise,   the notice     and   proceedings   thereafter   is   in   substance   and   effect   in confirmity   with   the   intent   and   purpose   of   the   act   as   has   been provided in Section 292B of the I.T. Act?"

Issue notice to the other side. Paper­books be filed within 3 months.  List these Appeals for final hearing after 3 months (Y.R. Meena, C.J.)       (J.C. Upadhyaya, J.) Kailash/B TAXAP/243/2007 2/2 ORDER