Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Abdul Salem Mastan vs State Of Karnataka on 11 October, 2023

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                     -1-
                                                               NC: 2023:KHC:37338
                                                              CRL.P No. 27 of 2023




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

                                                  BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                   CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 27 OF 2023
                        BETWEEN:
                        SRI ABDUL SALEM MASTAN
                        @ ABUDL SALEEM MASTHAN M R
                        S/O ABDUL REHAMAN D
                        AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

                        PERMANAT ADDRESS
                        NO 3434/19, SHANKAR VIHAR LAYOURT
                        BEHIND BEERESHWARA GYM ROAD
                        DEVARJ URS LAYOUT
                        DAVANAGERE 577 006

                        ADDITIONAL ADDRESS
                        DOOR NO 1037/2, 4TH CROSS
                        1ST MAIN, VINOBANAGAR
                        DAVANGERE 577 006
                        (WITH COMPLAINANT)

                        ALSO R/AT NO 25/2
Digitally signed by B
                        2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS
K
MAHENDRAKUMAR           RAJIV GANDHI ANGAR, HSR LAYOUT
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                6TH SECTOR, BOMMNAHALLI
KARNATAKA
                        BENGALURU 560 102
                        (WORKS FOR LIVELY HOOD)
                                                                      ...PETITIONER
                        (BY SRI. R SATISHCHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

                        AND:

                        1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                              BY SHO, WOMEN POLICE STATION
                              DAVANAGERE, REP BY SPP
                              HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                              BENGALURU 560 001.
                               -2-
                                           NC: 2023:KHC:37338
                                         CRL.P No. 27 of 2023




2.   SMT. FARAHNAZ
     W/O ABDUL SALEM MASTNA
     AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
     R/AT 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS
     VINOBHANAGAR, DAVANAGERE
     PIN CODE 577 006.
                                                ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M M, HCGP FOR R-1)

      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE
FIR, COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.74/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
498(A), 323, 342, 114, 504 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4
OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF II
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., DAVANAGERE.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                           ORDER

The learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent No.1.

2. The petitioner is sought to be prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 342, 114, 504 r/w Sec.34 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that, the accused No.1-husband, accused Nos.2 and 3- parents-in-laws, accused Nos.4 and 5-sisters-in-law subjected the defacto-complainant to cruelty, both mentally and physically, and also a demand was made to bring money from her parental home.

4. The respondent No.2 had filed O.S.No.12/2023 for dissolving her marriage with the accused No.1, and in the said proceedings, the matter was referred to Mediation Centre, -3- NC: 2023:KHC:37338 CRL.P No. 27 of 2023 Davanagere to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties.

5. The parties before the Mediation centre amicably resolved their dispute among themselves, and in terms of the settlement, the marriage of the defacto-complainant with the her husband has been dissolved mutually, and respondent No.2 has no objection for quashing the impugned FIR lodged against the petitioner. The accused No.1, in terms of the settlement has paid permanent alimony of Rs.12,00,000/- and also returned the gold ornaments presented at the time of the marriage.

6. Though the offences alleged against the petitioner- accused herein are cognizable and non-compoundable, however, having regard to the fact that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute among themselves, and the marriage of the accused with the defacto-complainant having dissolved mutually, and the defacto-complainant having agreed to withdraw the FIR, it would be a futile exercise, if the petitioners are subjected to investigation, since the probability of the police filing the charge sheet is unlikely in view of the settlement. Therefore, the continuation of investigation will be an abuse of process of law. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER
i) The Criminal Petition is allowed;
ii) The impugned FIR in Crime No.74/2022, registered by the Davanagere Women Police Station, pending on the file of -4- NC: 2023:KHC:37338 CRL.P No. 27 of 2023 the 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Davanagere stands quashed.

Sd/-

JUDGE BKM