Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Neeraj Kumar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 11 December, 2015

Author: Birendra Prasad Verma

Bench: Birendra Prasad Verma

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17692 of 2013
                 ======================================================
                 Neeraj Kumar Son of Krishnanandan Sharma Resident Of Village- Raunia,
                 P.S.- Naunatpur, District- Patna
                                                                       .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar
                 2. The Collector, Patna
                 3. The Circle Officer, Naubatpur, District- Patna
                                                                      .... .... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu
                 For the Respondent/s       : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Pd. Sinha, AC to GA-13
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
                 ORAL ORDER

5   11-12-2015

Heard the parties.

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the validity and correctness of notice dated 26.07.2013 (Annexure-1) issued by the respondent Circle Officer, Naubatpur inviting objections from the petitioner, besides others, before issuance of basgit parcha in favour of certain individuals belonging to Mahadalit families (Schedules castes community).

A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent Circle Officer, wherein it has been stated that in the Basgit Parcha Case No. 1 of 2013-14, now final order has been passed and bastit parcha has been issued under the provisions of The Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947 (In short ' Act, 1947') in favour of certain beneficiaries.

In above view of the matter, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, the petitioner, if so advised, shall be at liberty to assail the aforesaid final order passed by the respondent Circle Officer as also the Basgit parcha issued to the beneficiaries before Patna High Court CWJC No.17692 of 2013 (5) dt.11-12-2015 2/2 the District Collector, Patna under the provisions of Section 21 of the Act, 1947.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/-

U