Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Karthiyayini vs Amar Kumar Mahadevan on 26 August, 2015

Author: B.Rajendran

Bench: B. Rajendran

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED  :  26-08-2015

Coram

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN

Crl.R.C. No. 362 of 2009
Karthiyayini								.. Petitioner 
Versus
Amar Kumar Mahadevan
S/o.Major General Mahadevan
C/o.Fleet Operational Officer
Eastern Naval Command
Visakapattinam
Andhra Pradesh							.. Respondent 
	Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w.  401 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment  passed by the learned Additional District Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore, in Crl.A.No.82 of 2008, dated 30.09.2008, confirming the judgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Coimbatore in S.T.C.No.1607 of 2007, dated 24.01.2008. 
	For Petitioner 		:	Mr.Veera Kathiravan 
	  
ORDER

The revision petitioner is the complainant in S.T.C. No. 1607 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Coimbatore. The Trial Court, by judgment, dated 24.01.2008, has dismissed the application filed under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act and on finding that it is not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent/accused/husband has committed the offence under Domestic Violence Act has acquitted him. Aggrieved against which, the petitioner/wife has filed Crl.A.No.82 of 2008 before the Additional District Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore and the Appellate Court, by judgment dated 30.09.2008, has confirmed the judgment passed by the Trial Court. Aggrieved against the same, the present Criminal Revision Case is filed by the wife.

B.RAJENDRAN,J paa

2. Today, when the matter is taken up, Mr.Veera Kathiravan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/wife submitted that both parties have compromised the matter and they are living together.

3. Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that both parties have compromised the matter and they are living together, this Criminal Revision Case is closed.

26-08-2015 paa Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To

1.The Additional District Judge

-cum-Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore.

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Coimbatore.

Crl.R.C. No.362 of 2009