Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Kannan @ Govindaswamy vs State Of Kerala

Author: V.Chitambaresh

Bench: V.Chitambaresh

       

  

   

 
 
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                      PRESENT:

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

       WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/21ST KARTHIKA, 1936

                                               CRP.No. 97 of 2011
                                            ------------------------------
                               LB 658/1973 of TALUK LAND BOARD, PALAKKAD
                                            ........................................

REVISION PETITIONER:
--------------------------------------------

           1.                 KANNAN @ GOVINDASWAMY
                              S/O.APPU, NEAR ASSISI SCHOOL, KANJIKODE P.O.
                              PALAKKAD * DIED (LRs IMPLEADED)

          SUPPLEMENTAL P2 TO P5 IMPLEADED

          SUPPL. P2.          PANKAJAVALLI, W/O. LATE KANNAN@GOVINDASWAMI
                              WARD NO. 5/2, NEAR AZEEZI SCHOOL, K.N. PUTHUR
                              KANJIKODE P.O.,PALAKKAD - 678 621

          SUPPL. P3.          G. RAJESH, S/O. LATE KANNAN@GOVINDASWAMI
                              WARD NO. 5/2, NEAR AZEEZI SCHOOL, K.N. PUTHUR
                              KANJIKODE P.O.,PALAKKAD - 678 621

          SUPPL. P4.          G.RAJANEESH, W/O. LATE KANNAN@GOVINDASWAMI
                              WARD NO. 5/2, NEAR AZEEZI SCHOOL, K.N. PUTHUR
                              KANJIKODE P.O.,PALAKKAD - 678 621

          SUPPL. P5.          G. RAMESH, W/O. LATE KANNAN@GOVINDASWAMI
                              WARD NO. 5/2, NEAR AZEEZI SCHOOL, K.N. PUTHUR
                              KANJIKODE P.O.,PALAKKAD - 678 621

          * SUPPLEMENTAL P2 TO P5 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
             04.08.2014 IN I.A. NO. 1605/2014

           BY ADVS.SRI.K.LAKSHMINARAYANAN


RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------

       1. STATE OF KERALA
           REVENUE DEPARTMENT(LR)
           TRIVANDRUM - 695 001
           (REP.BY ITS SECRETARY)

CRP.No. 97 of 2011


    2. TALUK LAND BOARD,
       PALAKKAD - 678 001

    3. SMT. C.S. MEENAKSHI
      W/O. LATE SREERAM
      KAVUNGAL NIVAS
      9TH STREET
      VENKATESWARA COLONY
      AMBIKAPURAM
      PALAKKAD - 678 011


       R1 & R2 BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SUSHEELA R.BHAT


       THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
       ON 12-11-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYPASSED THE
       FOLLOWING:




DCS



                       V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
                      -------------------------------
                      C.R.P. No. 97 of 2011
                -----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 12th day of November, 2014


                            O R D E R

The identity of excess lands ordered to be surrendered by the Taluk Land Board as per the order impugned does not take in the land allegedly taken assignment of by the revision petitioner from the declarant. Therefore it is not necessary for the Taluk Land Board to consider the claim of the revision petitioner under Section 7E of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (the 'Act' for short) on the basis of the sale deed (Document No. 1291/1974) allegedly executed in his favour by the declarant. The revision petitioner is free to pursue his claim under Section 106B of the Act for the issue of a certificate of title by the Land Tribunal (after the Rules are framed) for which the impugned order of the Taluk Land Board would not be an impediment. The Land Tribunal shall advert to the decisions in Rajeev v. District Collector [2014(4) KLT 209] and State of Kerala v. Thomas Kurian [2014(4) KLT 417] as and when motion is made in that regard.

C.R.P. No. 97 of 2011 2

2. It is clarified that the sale deed in favour of the revision petitioner has been declared to be invalid by the Taluk Land Board only in the context of the transaction being after 01.01.1970.

The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

SD/-

V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS