Karnataka High Court
Sri.Bhavikatti V.S vs The Chief Secretary on 24 January, 2023
Author: B M Shyam Prasad
Bench: B M Shyam Prasad
-1-
WP No. 7428 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7428 OF 2021 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI.BHAVIKATTI V.S.
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O SAMBANNA BHAVIKATTI
WORKING AS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
HRD (DGM)
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE (HRD) HYDEL
KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD (KPCL)
JOG FALLS, SAGARA TALUK
SHIMOGA DIST.
2. SRI CHANDRA SHEKAR
AGED 57 YEARS,
S/O CHIKKERAIAH,
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HRD),
KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD. (KPCL),
NO.82, SHAKTHI BHAVAN,
Digitally signed by RACE COURSE ROAD,
NARASIMHA
MURTHY BANGALORE-560001
VANAMALA
Location: HIGH ...PETITIONERS
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. NATARAJ SHARMA S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE CHIEF SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
-2-
WP No. 7428 of 2021
ROOM NO.320, VIDHANA SOUDA
DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (DPAR),
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, 2ND FLOOR,
PODIUM BLOCK, VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWER,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-01
3. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
ROOM NO.236, 2ND FLOOR
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-01
4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD. (KPCL)
NO.82, SHAKTHI BHAVAN
RACE COURSE ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. M.C.NAGASHREE, AGA FOR R1-R3;
SRI. PRADYUMNA L. NARSIMHA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. PROMOD NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
RESTRAIN THE R-1 TO 3 TO DEPLOY PERSON ON DEPUTATION
TO THE POST OF GENERAL MANAGER (HR) FROM OUTSIDE
THE DEPARTMENT. DIRECT THE R-4 TO CONSTITUTE AND
MEET DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE TO
CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS AS
-3-
WP No. 7428 of 2021
PER THE PROMOTION SCHEME AND ELIGIBILITY ENUNICATED
IN ANNX-I OF VIDE ANNX-C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsels for the parties submit in unison that the second petitioner has been granted promotion and to this extent, the petition is rendered infructuous.
Sri. Nataraj Sharma S., the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the first petitioner would also not pursue the writ petition because he has attained the age of superannuation during the pendency of this petition.
In the light of the afore, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
SD/-
JUDGE RB