Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court

P.R.D.A.& Anr vs Shashi Shekhareshwar Pd.Nr.Sin on 15 April, 2015

Author: V.N. Sinha

Bench: V.N. Sinha, Ahsanuddin Amanullah

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                      Letters Patent Appeal No.1221 of 2002
                                         IN
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8690 of 2002
===========================================================
1. Patna Regional Development Authority, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali,
   District Patna through the Vice-Chairman, P.R.D.A. Patna
2. The Vice-Chairman, PRDA, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna
                                                   .... .... Appellants (Respondents)
                                      Versus
1. Smt. Suman Gupta wife of Raja Babu Gupta
2. Harish Kumar Gupta son of Raja Babu Gupta
3. Manorama Devi wife of Gobind Prasad Gupta
4. Puran Lal Agarwal son of Late Kanak Chandra. All resident of Bander Bagicha,
   P.S. Kotwali, District Patna
                                            .... .... Respondents 1st Set (Petitioners)
5. State of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development Department, New
   Secretariat, Patna
6. District Magistrate, Patna
                                          ... .... Respondent 2nd set
                                       with

===========================================================
                      Letters Patent Appeal No. 1222 of 2002
                                         IN
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8447 of 2002
===========================================================
1. Patna Regional Development Authority, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali,
    District Patna through the Vice-Chairman, P.R.D.A. Patna
2. The Vice-Chairman, PRDA, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna
                                              .... .... Respondents/Appellants
                                      Versus
1. Rajendra Prasad son of Shankar Prasad resident of Chirainya Tand Chauraha,
    P.S. Kankarbagh, District Patna
2. Umesh Kumar son of Sawan Mal, resident of Patna City, P.S. Alamganj,
    District - Patna
3. Shri Gopal son of Hira Lal Poddar, resident of Christan Colony, Lodipur, P.S.
    Gandhi Maidan, District Patna
4. Md. Ayub, son of Late Buland Mian, resident of Dadar Mandi, P.O.
    Gulzarbagh, Patna, District Patna
5. Narendra Kumar, son of Gajdev Mahto, resident of PNT Colony, Kidwaipuri,
    District Patna
6. Eqbal Ahmad, son of Md. Shahabuddin, resident of Sultanganj, near Kalka
    School, Patna -6
7. Safiquer Rahman, son of Late Md. Siddque resident of Bakerganj, Gola Road,
    Patna-4
8. Welayat Ali, son of Late Humanyun Nawab, resident of 7, Galaxy Apartment,
    NPP Colony, Patna-13
9. Md. Illiyas, son of Late Md. Gafar, resident of Danapur, Cantt., Danapur,
    District - Patna
10. M.K. Atul, son of Late B.K. Sahay, resident of K-18 P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh,
 Patna High Court LPA No.1221 of 2002 dt.15-04-2015

                                          2/3




        Patna
    11. Safadar Imam, son of Late Hassan Imam, resident of Lane Muradpur, Patna-4,
        District Patna
    12. A.R. Khan @ Atikkna, son of A. Majeed Khan, resident of C/o Hasan Manzil,
        Fraser Road, Patna-1
    13. Javed Eqbal, son of Late Khalilur Rahman, resident of Hassan Manzil, Fraser
        Road, Patna-1
                                        ....      ...         Respondents 1st Set
    14. State of Bihar
    15. Executive Engineer, PRDA, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna-1
                                                         .... .... Respondents 2nd set
                                          with

    ===========================================================
                         Letters Patent Appeal No. 1257 of 2002
                                            IN
                      Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8651 of 2002
    ===========================================================
    1. Patna Regional Development Authority, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali,
       District Patna through the Vice-Chairman, P.R.D.A. Patna
    2. The Vice-Chairman, PRDA, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna

                                                     .... ....   Appellants (Respondents)
                                         Versus
    Shashi Shekhareshwar Pd. Narayan Singh @ Shashi Shekhreshwar Prasad, son of
    late Sri Chandeshwar Prasad Narayan Singh, resident of Mohalla - Dak Bunglow
    Road, P.S. Kotwali, District - Patna
                                                      .... .... Petitioner/Respondent
    ===========================================================
    Appearance :
    (In LPA No. 1221 of 2002)
    For the Appellant/s :      Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate
    For the Respondent/s :     Mr.
    (In LPA No. 1222 of 2002)
    For the Appellant/s :      Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate
    For the Respondent/s :     Mr.
    (In LPA No. 1257 of 2002)
    For the Appellant/s :      Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate
    For the Respondent/s :     Mr.
    ===========================================================
    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA
               and
               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
    ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA) Date: 15-04-2015 In these appeals, notice was issued in admission matter under order dated 20.01.2005 and the operation of the impugned order Patna High Court LPA No.1221 of 2002 dt.15-04-2015 3/3 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court dated 16.09.2002 in CWJC No. 8466 of 2002 and analogous matters was stayed.

From the office note, it appears that the notice issued on the concerned respondent has not yet been served. During the pendency of the appeals because of the stay of the impugned order, the authorities of the then PRDA proceeded and the constructions were demolished and new constructions have also come up.

In the circumstances, prayer made in the appeals to set aside the order of the learned Single Judge has become infructuous and in that view of the matter, we dispose of the three appeals granting liberty to the successor Patna Municipal Corporation to proceed in accordance with law, if required.

(V.N. Sinha, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Arjun/-

U