Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Nagin Govindbhai vs State Of Gujarat & on 7 May, 2015

Author: Anant S.Dave

Bench: Anant S. Dave

        R/CR.MA/16284/2014                               ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 16284 of 2014
                                    With
           CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 16286 of 2014
                                    With
           CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 16287 of 2014

==========================================================
                    NAGIN GOVINDBHAI....Applicant(s)
                               Versus
                 STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DEVESH A BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR DEVANG VYAS, ASG for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR PARTH DIVYESHWAR for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR JK SHAH APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE

                               Date : 07/05/2015


                             COMMON ORAL ORDER

Heard   learned   counsels   for   the   parties,   Mr.  Devesh Bhatt for the petitioners, Mr. Parth Divyeshwar  for the respondent No.2 and Mr. J.K.Shah, learned APP  for the respondent No.1.

2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits  that the petitioners came to be arrested pursuant to  issuance   of   non­bailable   warrants   and   facts   of   the  present petitions are almost similar with the facts of  petitioner in Special Criminal Application No.4922 of  Page 1 of 3 R/CR.MA/16284/2014 ORDER 2014.  Learned counsel for the petitioners has adopted  the   submissions   made   by   Shri   R.J.Goswami,   learned  counsel appearing for petitioner in Special  Criminal  Application  No.4922   of   2014   and   prayed  that   all  the  petitioners herein are at par with the petitioner of  Special   Criminal   Application   No.4922   of   2014   and,  therefore, the present petitioners are also required  to be enlarged on bail.

Having heard learned counsels for the parties and  considering   the   facts   and   circumstances   of   the  petitions   and   in   view   of   what   is   recorded   in   order  dated   07.05.2015   passed   by   this   Court   in   Special  Criminal   Application   No.4922   of   2014,   all   these  petitions are allowed and the petitioners are ordered  to be released on bail pursuant to the complaint filed  with   Hon'ble   Designated   Special   Court,   District   and  Sessions,   Ahmedabad   [Rural]   being   PMLA   Case  No.01/2013, on executing a bond of Rs.50,000/­ (Rupees  Fifty Thousand only) each with one surety of the like  amount   to   the   satisfaction   of   the   trial   court   and  subject to the conditions that they shall;

[a] not   take   undue   advantage   of   liberty   or   misuse   liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of  the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court   within a week;

[d] not   leave   the   State   of   Gujarat   without   prior   permission of the  Sessions Judge concerned;

Page 2 of 3

R/CR.MA/16284/2014 ORDER [e] mark presence at the respondent No.2, on  the   first Sunday  of  every month between 10  a.m.  and 3 p.m for three months only;

[f] furnish the present  address of residence to the  I.O. and also to the Court  at   the   time   of   execution of the bond and shall not change the   residence   without   prior   permission   of   this   Court;

3 The   Authorities   will   release   the   petitioners  only   if   they   are   not   required   in   connection   with   any  other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the  above   conditions   is   committed,   the   Sessions   Judge  concerned   will   be   free   to   issue   warrant   or   take  appropriate   action   in   the   matter.   Bail   bond   to   be  executed   before   the   lower   court   having   jurisdiction   to  try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to  delete, modify  and/or  relax any of the above conditions  in   accordance   with   law.   At   the   trial,   the   trial   court  shall   not   be   influenced   by   the   observations   of  preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made  by   this   Court   while   enlarging   the   petitioners   on   bail.  Rule   is   made   absolute   to   the   aforesaid   extent.   D.S.  Permitted.

(ANANT S.DAVE, J.) pvv Page 3 of 3