Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Naresh Kumar Nagar And Ors vs Shri Naveen Mahajan And Ors on 30 April, 2018

Author: Alok Sharma

Bench: Alok Sharma

 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT
                            JAIPUR
           S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.1346/2017
1. Naresh Kumar Nagar S/o Rameshwar Nagar, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Borda, Post Harigarh, Tehsil Khanpur, Distt.
Jhalawar Raj.
2. Chandra Prakash Nagar S/o Shri Badri Lal Nagar, Aged About 27
Years, R/o V&P Jarga, Tehsil Khanpur, Distt Jhalawar Rajasthan.

3. Bhairu Singh Dhakar S/o Shri Lal Chand Dhakar, R/o Village
Dediya, Post Khandi, Tehsil Khanpur Distt. Jhalawar Raj.
4. Siyaram Dhakar S/o Shri Hemraj Dhakar, R/o Village
Bardhagwaliya Post Laifal, Tehsil Khanpur, Distt. Jhalawar Raj.
                                                      ----Petitioners
                              Versus
1. Shri Naveen Mahajan, Secretary Cum Commissioner,
Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
Jaipur Raj.
2. Mr. Banshilal Meena, Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad
Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
3. State of Rajasthan Through Secretary , Department of
Panchayati Raj. Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur Raj.
                                                    ----Respondents

_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S.K. Singodiya. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Aniroodh Mathur on behalf of Mr.Anurag Sharma, AAG.

_____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA Order 30/04/2018 Mr.S.K. Singodiya counsel for the petitioner submits that compliance with the order dated 23.05.2017 passed by this Court in SBCWP No.7902/2017 has been made, inasmuch as the representation filed pursuant thereto has been rejected.

In view of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notices are discharged.

(ALOK SHARMA), J Karan/19