Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

The State Of Rajasthan vs Mohammad Saeed on 3 November, 2025

Author: Pankaj Mithal

Bench: Pankaj Mithal

                                                                   SLP (C)   NO. 1411/2024 ETC.


     ITEM NO.58                         COURT NO.11                  SECTION XV

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

               PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)      NO(S).       1411/2024

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-04-2022
     in DBCWP No. 3248/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature for
     Rajasthan at Jaipur]

     THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.                                   PETITIONER(S)

                                               VERSUS

     MOHAMMAD SAEED & ORS.                                           RESPONDENT(S)

     (IA No. 144751/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     WITH
     SLP(C) No. 1377/2024 (XV)
     (IA No. 115639/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     SLP(C) No. 1442/2024 (XV)
     (IA No. 110323/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     SLP(C) No. 1744/2024 (XV)

     SLP(C) No. 1396/2024 (XV)

     Date : 03-11-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE


     For Petitioner(s)            Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv.
                                   Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR


     For Respondent(s)            Mr. Ajay Bansal, Adv.
                                  Mr. Kuldip Singh, AOR
Signature Not Verified            Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv.
Digitally signed by
geeta ahuja
                                  Ms. Anmol Minhas Kaur, Adv.
Date: 2025.11.04
16:51:53 IST
Reason:
                                  Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv.
                                  Mr. Saurabh Jindal, Adv.
                                  Mrs. Veena Bansal, Adv.

                                                1
                                                    SLP (C)   NO. 1411/2024 ETC.


               Mr. Sourav Jindal, Adv.
               Mr. Sanjay Yadava, Adv.

               Mr. Arunava Mukherjee, AOR
               Mr. Nisarg P. Khatri, Adv.

               Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR

               Dr. Brij Bhushan K Jauhari, Adv.
               Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv.
               Mr. O P Singh, Adv.
               Mr. Harsh Mahan, Adv.
               Mr. Aditya R Swami, Adv.
               Ms. Purnima Jauhari, AOR

               Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, AOR
               Dr. P.N. Mishra, Adv.
               Mrs. Hardeep Kaur Mishra, Adv.
               Mr. Praveen Mishra, Adv.
               Mr. Saurav Sharma, Adv.
               Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.
               Mr. Shiv Ram Pandey, Adv.
               Mrs. Sandhya Pandey, Adv.
               Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.


               Mr. Praveen Kumar Jha , AOR
               Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Adv.
               Mr. N.Sakthivel, Adv.
               Mr. S Thennavan, Adv.



     UPON hearing the counsel the court made the following
                         O R D E R

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The impugned order dated 04.04.2022 has been passed by the High Court in terms of the judgment and order dated 12.01.2022 passed in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Ms. Firdos Tarannum & Anr.”

3. Learned counsel for the State who had appeared before the High Court had not disputed that the matter is covered by the aforesaid judgment and order. 2 SLP (C) NO. 1411/2024 ETC.

4. The aforesaid judgment and order has attained finality in Civil Appeal NO.2646 of 2024 which has been disposed of on 14.02.2024.

5. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that it is not a case which requires any interference by us under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

6. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

   (Nidhi Mathur)                                      (Geeta Ahuja)
Court Master (NSH)                               Assistant Registrar-cum-PS




                                      3