Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

British Airways vs Kallol Basu on 31 July, 2017

Bench: Abhay Manohar Sapre, Prafulla C. Pant

     ITEM NO.4                            COURT NO.13                   SECTION XVII

                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                   No(s).    21886/2016

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-02-2016
     in FA No. 201/2010 passed by the National Consumers Disputes
     Reddressal Commission, New Delhi)

     BRITISH AIRWAYS                                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS

     KALLOL BASU & ORS.                                                     Respondent(s)



     Date : 31-07-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT


     For Petitioner(s)               Mr. S.Chakraborty, Adv.
                                     Ms. Surabhi Anand, Adv.
                                     M/s. Legal Options, AOR

     For Respondent(s)               Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR
                                     Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Adv.


                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

It is not disputed that after the impugned interim order was passed, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has also passed the final order in the appeal out of which this appeal arise. If that be so, then in our opinion, this special leave petition is rendered infructuous. The special leave petition is, accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Needless to say, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge Signature Not Verified the final order, if it is against it before the appropriate Forum in accordance with law.

Digitally signed by
SHASHI SAREEN
Date: 2017.08.01
11:56:14 IST
Reason:



     (SHASHI SAREEN)                                                (S. SIVARAMAKRISHNA)
        AR CUM PS                                                     ASST.REGISTRAR