Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ajay Singh Gehlawat vs Municipal Council Sonepat And Others on 13 July, 2012

Author: Rajan Gupta

Bench: Rajan Gupta

CR No. 3963 of 2012 (O&M)                                               1


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                            CR No. 3963 of 2012 (O&M)
                                            Date of decision: 13.7.2012

Ajay Singh Gehlawat
                                                      ... Petitioner
                            versus

Municipal Council Sonepat and others
                                                      ... Respondents

CORAM:       Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajan Gupta

Present:        Mr.N.S.Panwar, Advocate,
                for the petitioner.

Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)

Petitioner has impugned orders dated 30.4.2012 and 4.6.2012. Only plea raised before this court is that Local Commissioner appointed by the court below needs to be changed as he is likely to be biased against petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application was also moved before the court below but same was rejected. Thus interference of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution has been necessitated.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

It is evident that Local Commissioner was appointed by the court below to visit the site and report whether level of street in question has been raised or not. If so, effect thereof. Petitioner is, however, apprehensive that Local Commissioner appointed by the court below would give a biased report. I am not convinced with this plea. Petition has been preferred merely on the basis of apprehension. Report of Local Commissioner is still awaited. No ground is made out for interference in CR No. 3963 of 2012 (O&M) 2 revisional jurisdiction of this court.

Petition is without any merit and is dismissed.



13.7.2012                                         (RAJAN GUPTA)
pk                                                   JUDGE