Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Gauhati High Court

Viki Deep Das vs The State Of Assam And 6 Ors on 11 January, 2021

Author: Suman Shyam

Bench: Suman Shyam

                                                                 Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010190472020




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/14/2021

         VIKI DEEP DAS
         S/O- SRI PRADIP KUMAR DAS, R/O- VILL- BORJHAR, GUWAHATI AIRPORT,
         SOS ROAD, P.O. VIP AIRPORT, P.S. AZARA, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
         REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ASSAM
         GRAMIN VIKASH BANK FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL
         DEVELOPMENT

         2:THE BOARD OF DIRECTOR OF ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK
          GUWAHATI

         3:THE CHAIRMAN
         ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK HEAD OFFICE
          GUWAHATI BHANGAGARH
         ASSAM
          REP. BY UPENDRA SABAR

         4:THE GENERAL MANAGERS
         AGVB HEAD OFFICE
          BHANGAGARH
          GUWAHATI

         5:THE CHIEF MANAGER (PERSONNEL AND VIGILANCE)
         ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK HEAD OFFICE
          GUWAHATI

         6:THE REGIONAL MANAGER
         A.G.V.B. GOLAGHAT REGIONAL OFFICE
          GOLAGHAT
                                                                                   Page No.# 2/2


            7:THE BRANCH MANAGER
            ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK RAJAGAON BRANC

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MS. R KALITA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, A G V B




                                     BEFORE
                        HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

                                             ORDER

11.01.2021 Heard Ms. R. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Issue notice of motion returnable in six weeks. Mr. D. Banerjee learned Standing Counsel, Assam Gramin Vikash Bank, has entered appearance and accepted notice on behalf of all the respondents. As such, no formal notice is required to be sent in this case. However, extra copies of the writ petition, requisite in numbers, be furnished to the learned departmental counsel, within a week from today, so as to enable him to obtain instruction and place the same on record on or before the returnable date.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant