Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Emmanuel P.M vs State Of Kerala

Author: Anu Sivaraman

Bench: Anu Sivaraman

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                         PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

         WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1939

                            WP(C).No. 36135 of 2017 (N)
                            ----------------------------


PETITIONERS:
-----------

         1. EMMANUEL P.M.,
            AGED 57 YEARS,HEAD MASTER(RETIRED),
            LITTLE FLOWER UP SCHOOL,PASUKKADAVE,
            RESIDING AT PUTHUPPALLY THAKIDIYAL HOUSE,
            MARUTHONKARA,KAVILUMPARA,
            KOZHIKODE,PIN-673513.

         2. BABY MATHEW,
            AGED 57 YEARS,HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT(RETIRED),
            ST.MARY'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,
            MARUTHONKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
            RESIDING AT NEENDUKUNNAL HOUSE,
            PASUKKADAVE, KOZHKODE,PIN-673528.


               BY ADV. SRI.SIJI ANTONY


RESPONDENTS:
-----------

         1. STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
            FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
            GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.

         2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
            EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
            GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.

         3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.

         4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL(A&E),
            KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695039.

         5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,KOZHIKODE,
            OFFICE OF D.D.E,KOZHIKODE,PIN-673001.


               BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-12-2017,
       THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

EL
WP(C).No. 36135 of 2017 (N)
----------------------------

                                    APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
EXHIBIT P1        A TRUE COPY OF THE DATA INPUT SHEET ATTACHED WITH THE
                  STATUTORY APPLICATION

EXHIBIT P1(A)    A TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE VERIFICATION REPORT NO.P.R.2101779651
                 DATED 11.07.2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST
                 PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P1(B)    A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION SLIP OF PENSIONARY BENEFITS
                 DATED 21.06.2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST
                 PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P1(C)    A TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS NO.K.DIS.B1.6938/06 DATED
                 22.09.2016 WAS SANCTIONED BY DEO VADAKARA.

EXHIBIT P2       A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE SERVICE BOOK OF THE
                 2ND PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P2(A)    A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF FIXATION AS PER ORDER
                 NO.K.DIS.BI/3377/2014 DATED O2.12.2014

EXHIBIT P2(B)    A TRUE COPY OF THE DATA INPUT SHEET ALONG WITH FORM NO.2 OF
                 PENSION PROPOSAL OF THE 2ND PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P2(C)    TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE VERTIFICATION REPORT NO.P.R.2101670849
                 DATED 30.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST
                 RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P2(D)    TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION SLIP OF PENSIONARY BENEFITS DATED
                 30.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P3       TRUE COPY OF THE LATEST STATEMENT OF FIXATION AS PER ORDER
                 NO.K.DIS.BI/2224/2016 DATED 20.04.2016

EXHIBIT P3(A)    TRUE COPY OF THE DATA INPUT SHEET ALONG WITH FORM NO.2 OF
                 PENSION PROPOSAL

EXHIBIT P3(B)    TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE VERIFICATION REPORT NO.P.R.2101670907
                 DATED 01.02.2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD
                 PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P3(C)    TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION SLIP OF PENSIONARY BENEFITS DATED
                 01.02.2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P4       TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS).74/68/EDN.DATED 24.02.1968

EXHIBIT P5       TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT G.O
                 (P)NO.66/2016/FIN DATED 09.05.2016

EXHIBIT P6       TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AS
                 G.O(P)NO.113/2016/FIN.DATED 05.08.2016

EXHIBIT P7       TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED
                 06.08.2015 VIDE G.O.(RT)NO.7194/2015

EXHIBIT P8       TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN
                 W.P.(C)NO.20495/2013 DATED 23.07.2014
WP(C).No. 36135 of 2017 (N)
---------------------------

EXHIBIT P9          TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 23.2.2015 IN W.A.NO.377/2015

EXHIBIT P10         TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.07.2015 IN SLP(C)NO.19441/2015
                    PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT

EXHIBIT P11         TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.30167/2016 REPORTED IN 2017
                    KHC (5)PAGE 120.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

              NIL

                                                               TRUE COPY



                                                              P.S. TO JUDGE

EL

                    ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
               --------------------------------
                W.P.(C).No.36135 of 2017
               ---------------------------------
        Dated this the 13th day of December, 2017


                       JUDGMENT

------------------

Petitioners are retired Aided School teachers. Petitioners' grievance is that the broken/provisional service rendered by them in Aided Schools prior to their commencement of the regular service is not reckoned for the purpose of pension.

2. This Court already held in the judgment dated 14.08.2017, in W.P.(C) No.30167 of 2016 and connected cases that the provisional service rendered in Aided school prior to the commencement of regular service in Aided School is liable to be considered for pension. The case of the petitioners would also be governed by the said judgment.

3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to re-fix the pensionary benefits of the petitioners, after reckoning the provisional service rendered by them in Aided Schools along with their regular service and to grant them all consequential benefits. W.P.(C).No.36135 of 2017 2 Such benefits shall be granted to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE rmm // True Copy // P.A. To Judge