Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Vipul Dilip Shah & Anr vs Parinee Developers Pvt Ltd Through Irp ... on 17 February, 2021

           NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                         NEW DELHI
                Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.602 of 2020

[Arising out of Order dated 09.06.2020 passed by National Company Law
Tribunal, Mumbai Bench - II in CP (IB) 4147/MB/C-II/2019]

IN THE MATTER OF:                 Before NCLT              Before NCLAT
1. Vipul Dilip Shah                 ...                      Appellant No.1
   3rd Floor,
   Deepak Building,
   Plot No. - 401,
   S.V. Road,
   Opp. Pawan Hans,
   Ville Parle (West),
   Mumbai - 400056

2. Dhaval Dilip Shah                ...                      Appellant No.2
   3rd Floor,
   Deepak Building,
   Plot No. - 401,
   S.V. Road,
   Opp. Pawan Hans,
   Ville Parle (West),
   Mumbai - 400056


      Versus


1. Parinee Developers Pvt.        Respondent/              Respondent No.1
   Ltd.                           Corporate Debtor
   Through IRP
   Mr. Subhash Chandra
   Modi,
   1301/02, Silver Oak,
   Raheja Willows
   CHS Ltd.,
   Akurli Road,
   Kandivali (E),
   Mumbai - 400101

2. STCI Finance Limited           Appellant/               Respondent No.2
   A/B 1-802,                     Financial Creditor
   A-Wing, 8th Floor,
   Marathon Innova,
   Marathon Nextgen
   Compound,
                                     -2-

   Off Ganpatrao Kadam
   Marg, Lower Parel (W),
   Mumbai - 400013


For Appellants:         Shri Chandra Prakash and Shri Aditya Shankar,
                        Advocates

For Respondent:         Shri B. Gopalakrishnan and Shri Reuben
                        Moscreen, Advocates (R-1)
                        Ms. Surekha Raman, Ms. Ferzana Behramkamdin
                        and Shri Saahil Bijliwala, Advocates (R-2)
                        Ms. Ishita, Advocate (R-3)

                                ORDER

(Virtual Mode) 17.02.2021 The learned Counsel for the Appellants - Shri Chandra Prakash submits that already decision has been taken with regard to Section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC - in short) by the COC (Committee of Creditors) and the matter has been placed by the Resolution Professional before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench - II) for withdrawal Orders. The learned Counsel for Appellants submits that the Appellants have instructed him to withdraw the present Appeal.

The learned Counsel for the Resolution Professional - Shri B. Gopalkrishnan also submits that the parties have already settled and under Section 12A of IBC, the matter has been placed before the Adjudicating Authority to pass Orders so that the Respondent No.2 - Financial Creditor can withdraw the Application which was filed under Section 7 of IBC.

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.602 of 2020 -3- Counsel for Respondent No.2 - Financial Creditor also states that once Adjudicating Authority passes Orders, they would be withdrawing the Application under Section 7 of IBC.

Counsel for the Appellants states that in view of the developments, the Appellants have asked him to withdraw the Appeal and he wants to withdraw the Appeal.

On request of the Appellants, the Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn without liberty to challenge the same Impugned Order.

The Appeal is disposed as withdrawn.

[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial) [Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) rs/md Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.602 of 2020