Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Jayant Bhalchandra Udgaonkar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 28 August, 2023

Author: N.J.Jamadar

Bench: N.J.Jamadar

2023:BHC-AS:24918

                                                                               16 aba 2414 of 2023.doc

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                       ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2414 OF 2023

            Dr. Jayant Bhalchandra Udgaonkar                     ...          Applicant
                   versus
            The State of Maharashtra and Ors.                    ...          Respondents

            Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate with Dr. Rajendra Anbhule, for Applicant.
            Mrs. A.A.Takalkar, APP for State.

                                CORAM:       N.J.JAMADAR, J.

                                DATE :       28 AUGUST 2023

            P.C.

            1.           Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

            2.           This is an application to protect the liberty of the applicant by way of

            transit anticipatory bail in connection with CR No.493 of 2022 registered with GTB

            Enclave Police Station, District Shahdara, New Delhi, for the offences punishable

            under Sections 406, 354D, 509, 506, 306 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal

            Code, 1860 ("the Penal Code") and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act,

            2000 and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957.

            3.           The applicant claims that he was the Director of Indian Institute of

            Science Education and Research, Pune (IISER). Presently, he is posted as a Professor

            in the said Institute. The first informant was pursuing her Ph.D. at IISER, Pune. Dr.

            Anindya Goswami was appointed as a Supervisor of the first informant. Ms. 'S' was

            another student under the supervision of Dr. Anindya Goswami.

            SSP                                                       1/4
                                                                     16 aba 2414 of 2023.doc

4.            The first informant lodged a report with the allegations that Dr. Anindya

Goswami had included Ms. 'S's name as an author in respect of the work done by the

first informant. Upon being confronted, Dr. Anindya Goswami threatened to finish

the career of the first informant. It is further alleged that the applicant being the

Director at the said institute also exerted pressure on the first informant not to pursue

her complaint against Dr. Anindya Goswami.

5.            On the basis of the aforesaid allegations initially FIR was registered for

an offence punishable under Section 406 of the Penal Code only. It seems Dr.

Anindya Goswami approached the Delhi High Court for quashing the FIR, and has

been protected by an order passed by the Delhi High Court in CRL.M.C.963/2023,

dated 10th February, 2023. Subsequently, the investigation came to be transferred to

PS Cyber, Shahdara, and further statements were recorded.

6.            In view of the aforesaid development, the applicant was served with a

notice dated 5th August, 2023 to join in the investigation of the said offences registered

at PS Cyber, Shahdara, Delhi, on 9th August, 2023.

7.            The applicant apprehends arrest in connection with the said offence.

Mr. Desai, the learned Senior Advocate for the applicant, prayed for interim

protection by way of transit anticipatory bail in the light of the allegations in the FIR

and the position of the applicant as the Professor at the Institute, wherein the first

informant has been pursuing Ph.D.


SSP                                                         2/4
                                                                     16 aba 2414 of 2023.doc

8.            The allegations are primarily against Dr. Anindya Goswami, who has

been protected by an order passed by the Delhi High Court. The applicant appears to

have firm roots in society. The apprehension of arrest in the context of the situation in

life of the applicant and the nature of the allegations, cannot be said to be wholly

unfounded. The applicant is willing to join in the investigation.

9.            In the circumstances, the applicant is entitled to interim protection to

facilitate him to approach the jurisdictional Court and work out the remedies.

10.           Hence, the following order:


                                      :ORDER:

(i) The applicant shall appear before the Investigating Officer PS Cyber, District Shahdara, Delhi, on or before 5th September, 2023.

(ii) In the meanwhile, in the event of arrest of the applicant in CR No.493 of 2022 registered with GTB Enclave Police Station, District Shahdara, New Delhi, now transferred to PS Cyber, District Shahdara, Delhi, the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a PR Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- and one or two sureties in the like amount or cash security in lieu thereof, till 7th September, 2023.

(iii) The applicant shall cooperate with the investigation. SSP 3/4

16 aba 2414 of 2023.doc

(iv) The applicant shall not give any threat or inducement to the first informant or any person acquainted with the facts of the case.

                               (v)     Application stands disposed.

                                                                                         ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )




                      SSP                                                          4/4



Signed by: S.S.Phadke
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 30/08/2023 20:07:03