Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Geeta Devi Dubey vs Mukesh Kumar Dubey on 7 March, 2014

"
ITEM NO.35                  COURT NO.7             SECTION XVIA




              S U P R E M E    C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 684 OF 2013


GEETA DEVI DUBEY                                      Petitioner(s)


                   VERSUS


MUKESH KUMAR DUBEY                                    Respondent(s)


(With appln(s) for stay and office report ))


Date: 07/03/2014    This Petition was called on for hearing today.


CORAM :
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI




For Petitioner(s)
                     Mr. Arup Banerjee,Adv.
       Mohd. Naved, Adv.


For Respondent(s)
       Mr. Shree Prakash sinha, Adv.
       Mr. Inderpreet Singh, Adv.
       Mr. Rakesh Mishra, Adv.
       Mr. Janme Jay, Adv.
                     Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv.




             UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                 O R D E R

The transfer petition is dismissed in terms of the observations made in the signed order.





           (Sukhbir Paul Kaur)                      (Indu Bala Kapur)
              Court Master                            Court Master


(Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO.684 OF 2013 GEETA DEVI DUBEY ...PETITIONER(S) Versus MUKESH KUMAR DUBEY ...RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the averments made in the affidavit.

In view of the averments made in the affidavit, we are not inclined to grant prayer for transfer. The Transfer Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Learned counsel for the respondent-husband has, however, voluntarily offered that the husband will reimburse the travel expenses of the petitioner-wife and one companion on each date. The wife and the companion shall be provided with the amount equivalent to second class A.C. train fare, if available, otherwise second class train fare.

..........................J. (SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR) ..........................J. (A.K.SIKRI) New Delhi, March 07, 2014