Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Vishal Singhi vs Sri B Gyanchand on 18 November, 2023

Author: S.G.Pandit

Bench: S.G.Pandit

                                         -1-
                                                     NC: 2023:KHC:41393
                                                    WP No. 1518 of 2021




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

                                      BEFORE

                     THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT

                  WRIT PETITION NO. 1518 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)

              BETWEEN:

              SRI VISHAL SINGHI
              S/O J DHANMAL SINGHI
              AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
              R/AT NO.14/2, S P COMPLEX
              3RD FLOOR, PILLAPPA LANE
              NEAR PATEL ANGADIA TRANSPORT
              JUMMA MASJID ROAD CROSS
              BANGALORE-560002.
                                                           ...PETITIONER
              (BY SRI. ABHIJITH M M, ADV.-ABSENT)

              AND:

              SRI B GYANCHAND
              S/O LATE R BASTAMAL
Digitally
signed by B   AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
LAVANYA       PROPRIETOR OF M/S TULASI
Location:     AIR TRAVELS OFFICE AT NO.38/107
HIGH          1ST FLOOR, DEVANGAL MARKET
COURT OF      J M ROAD, BANGALORE-560002.
KARNATAKA                                                ...RESPONDENT
              (RESPONDENT IS SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)

                   THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
              CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE
              RECORDS FROM THE FILE OF THE LEARNED LXVII ADDL. CITY
              CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH.NO.68) AT BANGALORE, IN
              EX.CASE NO.1799/2018 AND IN MISC.PET.NO.18/2019 IN
                              -2-
                                            NC: 2023:KHC:41393
                                        WP No. 1518 of 2021




O.S.NO.9460/2015 AND PERUSE           THE     SAME     AS   PER
ANNEXURE-C AND E AND ETC.

       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner. Even on earlier occasions i.e., 09.11.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. This Court granted interim order of stay, subject to deposit of 10% of the decreetal amount within three weeks and another 10% within next three weeks before the court below. The petitioner has not filed compliance report.

In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30