Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rekhaben Chandrakant Mandanka vs Mukeshbhai Ambalal Patel & 7 on 12 September, 2016

Author: A.G.Uraizee

Bench: A.G.Uraizee

                    C/AO/263/2016                                               ORDER



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                           APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 263 of 2016
                                               With
                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7145 of 2016
                                                 In
                            APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 263 of 2016
         ==========================================================
                            REKHABEN CHANDRAKANT MANDANKA....Appellant(s)
                                                   Versus
                            MUKESHBHAI AMBALAL PATEL & 7....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR JIGAR P RAVAL, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
         MR PARTHIV B SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 4
         MS ARCHANA R ACHARYA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 5 - 8
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

                                        Date : 12/09/2016
                                         ORAL ORDER

Order in A.O. No.263/2016 Admit.

Mr.   Parthiv   B.   Shah,   learned   advocate   for  respondent   Nos.   1   to   4   and   Ms.   Archana   R.  Acharya,   learned   advocate   for   respondent   Nos.   5  to 8 urges that the notice of admission be served  on respondents through Court. 

Order in C.A. No.7145/2016 Rule   returnable   on  17th  October,   2016.   Mr.  Parthiv B. Shah, learned advocate waives service  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Sep 15 01:39:59 IST 2016 C/AO/263/2016 ORDER of notice of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1  to 4 and Ms. Archana R. Acharya, learned advocate  waives   service   of   notice   of   rule   on   behalf   of  respondent Nos. 5 to 8. 

Mr.   Shah,   learned   advocate   for   respondent  Nos.   1   to   4   states   that   in   the   meantime,   the  concerned   respondents   shall   not   deal   with   the  subject property and maintain status quo.

Registry   is   directed   to   list   Appeal   from  Order   No.263   of   2016   for   final   hearing   on  17th  October,   2017  along   with   present   Civil  Application. 

The   learned   advocates   appearing   for  respective   respondents   may   file   the   reply  affidavit in the Registry. 

(A.G.URAIZEE,J) Manoj Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu Sep 15 01:39:59 IST 2016