Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Palanivel vs Mahadeer Mohammadhu on 28 August, 2019

Author: S.S.Sundar

Bench: S.S.Sundar

                                                                   C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1524 of 2011




                     BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
                                              DATED: 28.08.2019
                                                    CORAM
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
                                         C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1524 of 2011
                                                     and
                                             M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011


                 Palanivel                         : Petitioner/Petitioner/1st Defendant



                                                     .. Vs ..



                 1.Mahadeer Mohammadhu
                 2.Abudhamer           : Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs



                 PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
                 Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order passed in
                 I.A.No.169 of 2011, dated 18.03.2011 in O.S.No.3 of 2003 on the
                 file of the District Munsif, Aranthangi and allow the same by
                 allowing this revision.


                                    For Petitioner  : Mr.K.Baalasundharam
                                    For Respondents : Mr.N.Balakrishnan
                                                    -----

                                                    ORDER

It is represented by the learned Counsel for the respondents that the suit itself was disposed of on merits on 28.09.2018. It was, therefore, submitted that the prayer in this http://www.judis.nic.in 1/3 C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1524 of 2011 Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Though the learned Counsel for the petitioner was given time to verify and to get instructions, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is unable to get instructions. The learned Counsel for the respondents further states that as against the judgment and decree in the suit, the respondents have preferred an appeal before the Sub Court, Aranthangi. In such circumstances, recording the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.


                                                                     28.08.2019
                 Internet : Yes/No
                 Index    : Yes/No
                 SRM

                 To

                 The District Munsif,
                 Aranthangi.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                 2/3

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1524 of 2011 S.S.SUNDAR, J.

srm C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1524 of 2011 28.08.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in 3/3