Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Karsanba D/O Nathuji Madhuji Vaghela ... vs Jugaji Nathuji Vaghel (Decd) Through ... on 2 April, 2014

Author: S.H.Vora

Bench: S.H.Vora

              C/AO/103/2013                                                    ORDER




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 103 of 2013


                                               With
                        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3002 of 2013
                                                In
                      APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 103 of 2013
================================================================
     KARSANBA D/O NATHUJI MADHUJI VAGHELA THROUGH POA RAOL
                        MAHEN....Appellant(s)
                               Versus
       JUGAJI NATHUJI VAGHEL (DECD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS &
                         8....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR RJ GOSWAMI, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HARSHIT S TOLIA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1.1 , 2.1 , 3.1 , 4.1 , 5
MR PARTH S TOLIA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1.1 , 2.1 , 3.1 , 4.1 , 5
MS ANUJA S NANAVATI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 7 - 9
NOTICE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 6
================================================================

            CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.H.VORA

                                      Date : 02/04/2014


                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Challenge in this Appeal From Order is the order dated 10.1.2013 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kalol in Special Civil Suit No.14 of 2012 below application Exhibit 5, whereby learned trial Judge rejected the application Exhibit 5 filed by the plaintiff.

2. Learned advocate Mr. R.J. Goswami appearing on behalf of the appellant - original plaintiff does not invite reasoned order but states that the plaintiff may be permitted to amend the plaint with suitable relief challenging the sale deed Page 1 of 2 C/AO/103/2013 ORDER executed in favour of the defendants inter se.

3. As and when such amend application along with appropriate injunction application, are moved by the plaintiff, the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kalol, shall decide the same in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observation recorded in the impugned order.

4. This Court has not examined present Appeal From Order on its merits.

5. In view of the above, present Appeal From Order stands disposed of as not pressed.

CIVIL APPLICATION No.3002 of 2013 :

In view of the withdrawal of the Appeal From Order, present Civil Application stands disposed of. Notice is discharged. Ad interim relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
(S.H.VORA, J.) YNVYAS Page 2 of 2