Gujarat High Court
Lalitaben Govindbhai Patel & 2 vs Gujarat State Financial Corporation & 8 on 12 January, 2018
Bench: M.R. Shah, Biren Vaishnav
C/CA/301/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR BRINGING HEIRS) NO. 301 of 2018
In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2480 of 2010
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12979 of 2009
==========================================
===
LALITABEN GOVINDBHAI PATEL & 2....Applicant(s)
Versus
GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION & 8....Respondent(s)
=============================================
Appearance:
MR AS VAKIL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 1.2 , 2 3
MR ASHISH H SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 6
MR DEVANG D TRIVEDI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR GM JOSHI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 3 , 9
MR PRANAV G DESAI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 4
MS AMEE YAJNIK, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 6
NANAVATI ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 5
=============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 12/01/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH) Rule. Shri Devang Trivedi, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.1, Shri K.M. Parikh, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 9, Shri Divyesh Bais, learned advocate for Nanavati Associates waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.5 and Shri Abhijit Joshi, learned advocate waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent no.6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, present application is taken up for final hearing today.
Page 1 of 2HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Fri Jan 12 22:58:40 IST 2018 C/CA/301/2018 ORDER Present application has been preferred by the applicants herein claiming to be the heirs and legal representatives of original appellant no.1 of Letters Patent Appeal No. 2480 of 2010 Lalitaben Govindbhai Patel (now deceased) permitting them to be brought on record as appellant nos. 1.1 and 1.2 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 2480 of 2010.
Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and considering the averments in the application, present application is allowed. Applicant nos. 1.1 to 1.2 are permitted to be joined as appellant nos. 1.1 and 1.2 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 2480 of 2010 as heirs and legal representatives of original appellant no.1 Lalitaben Patel. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No costs.
Registry is directed to amend the cause title of the Letters Patent Appeal No. 2480 of 2010 accordingly.
(M.R. SHAH, J.) (BIREN VAISHNAV, J.) Kaushik Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Fri Jan 12 22:58:40 IST 2018