Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Ambuj Kumar vs State Of Up And 5 Others on 9 September, 2024

Author: Dinesh Pathak

Bench: Dinesh Pathak





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:146752
 
Court No. - 49
 

 
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3522 of 2024
 

 
Petitioner :- Ambuj Kumar
 
Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
 

1. It is submitted that despite the order passed in proceeding under Rule 109-A of U.P.C.H. Rules and issuance of Parwana Amaldaramad dated 14.05.2010, till date, revenue records are not corrected in pursuance thereof. It is next submitted that order passed by the Consolidation Officer has been affirmed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation vide order dated 26.07.2024 (Annexure-6).

2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in issuing a direction for implementation of Parwana Amaldaramad dated 14.05.2010 (Annexure-1).

3. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending. Therefore, this court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction that petitioner is at liberty to move a fresh representation before the Consolidation Officer for implementation of Parwana Amaldaramad dated 14.05.2010, who shall take an appropriate step to correct the land revenue record strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is finally disposed of.

Order Date :- 9.9.2024 Rama Kant