Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Desiya Murpokku Tnpl Oppantha vs Md.Nasimuddin on 27 April, 2022

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                                         Cont. P. (MD) No.832 of 2021

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED:27.04.2022

                                                     CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                          Cont. P.(MD) No.832 of 2021


                     Desiya Murpokku TNPL Oppantha
                                Thozhilalar Sangam (Regn No.99/Karur)
                     rep. by its President, Pon.Elangovan
                     18/1 Arasi Nagar (Pugazhi Nagar South)
                     Velayuthampalayam (P.O.)
                     Karur District                         ... Petitioner/Petitioner

                                                        Vs.
                     1.Md.Nasimuddin
                       Principal Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu
                       Labour and Employment Department
                       Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

                     2.M.Vallalar
                       Commissioner of Labour
                       DMS Complex,
                       Teynampet,
                       Chennai

                     3.M.V.Senthilkumar
                       Director of Industrial Safety and Health
                       (formerly Chief Inspector of Factories)
                       No.47/1 Near Metro Water Roundana
                       SIDCO Industrial Estate
                       Guindy, Chennai.


                     1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                         Cont. P. (MD) No.832 of 2021



                     4.C.Malathi
                       Joint Director of Industrial Safety and Health
                       Plot No.23 III Street
                       Khajamalai
                       Trichy 620 020.                         .. Contemnors/Respondents


                     Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
                     Courts Act, 1971 to punish the contemnors/respondents under Section 11
                     of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for their wanton and wilful disobedience
                     of the order dated 16.03.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.4927
                     of 2020.


                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.T.Sakthikumaran


                                                     ORDER

The contempt petition is filed to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order dated 16.03.2020 passed in W.P. (MD) No.4927/2020.

2. The writ petition was filed by the Desiya Murpokku TNPL Oppantha Thozhilalar Sangam consisting of members, who are all the workmen engaged by the contractors. Based on the terms and conditions 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont. P. (MD) No.832 of 2021 of contract, the contractor has to submit necessary proposals for claiming certain benefits with the Tamil Nadu State Advisory Contract Labour Board and thereafter the board has to take a decision.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader made a submission that the order passed by this Court on 16.03.2020 has been implemented and the board has already taken a decision and such decisions were also implemented by the authorities. However, for complete implementation, the contractors concerned are bound to submit necessary proposals in respect of individual workmen with all other details. The eligibility and other particulars are to be verified by the competent authorities for disbursing the benefits in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules.

4. In short, the learned Additional Government Pleader made a submission that the board has taken a decision and the said decision is sought to the implemented in the writ petition. The implementation part is also properly complied with and a compliance report has also been filed. In respect of individual grievance, if any exists, it is for the 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont. P. (MD) No.832 of 2021 individual to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. Contrarily, the petitioner sangam cannot file a contempt petition in respect of the individual grievances and there may be 100's of such members and the sangam cannot file 100's of contempt petitions on each and every occasion and as per the compliance report, the decision of the board has been implemented in all respects and in the event of filing the application by following proper procedure, the same will be paid to the workmen in accordance with the provisions of the Act and rules. The members of the petitioner sangam, who are all aggrieved, are at liberty to approach the appropriate authority under the act for redressal of their grievance in the manner prescribed. If at all any such application is filed, the same can be decided as expeditiously as possible.

The contempt petition stands closed.

27.04.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes RR 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont. P. (MD) No.832 of 2021 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

RR Cont. P. (MD) No.832 of 2022 27.04.2022 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis