Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Grace Gharunda vs Naina Fernandez And 2 Ors on 5 April, 2021

Author: V. G. Bisht

Bench: R. D. Dhanuka, V. G. Bisht

bdp
                                     1/3
                                                        Paucity (OS).doc

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                 42.APPEAL NO. 536 OF 2019
                            IN
           ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1022 OF 2016
                          WITH
             NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 992 OF 2019
                            IN
                  APPEAL NO. 536 OF 2019

                       AND
        43.COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 581 OF 2019
                        IN
      COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 570 OF 2017
                       WITH
           NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 999 OF 2019
                        IN
         COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 581 OF 2019

                          AND
                 44.APPEAL NO. 589 OF 2019
                            IN
            ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 680 OF 2016

                        AND
         45.COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2020
                         IN
      COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1278 OF 2019
                       WITH
         INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2137 OF 2019
                         IN
          COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2020

                    ALONG WITH
          COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2020
                         IN
      COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1260 OF 2019
                       WITH
         INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2140 OF 2019




      ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021         ::: Downloaded on - 05/04/2021 22:26:00 :::
 bdp
                                     2/3
                                                        Paucity (OS).doc

                            IN
               COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2020

                    ALONG WITH
          COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 38 OF 2020
                         IN
      COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1312 OF 2019
                       WITH
         INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2138 OF 2019
                         IN
          COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 38 OF 2020

                            AND
             46.COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2020
                             IN
               CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 445 OF 2019
                            WITH
              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 433 OF 2019
                             IN
               COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2020

                           AND
            47.COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2020
                            IN
              NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2467 OF 2019
                           WITH
             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 480 OF 2019
                            IN
             COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2020

                          AND
                 49.APPEAL NO. 625 OF 2005
                            IN
            ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 545 OF 2003
                          WITH
             NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 983 OF 2019
                            IN
                  APPEAL NO. 625 OF 2005




      ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021         ::: Downloaded on - 05/04/2021 22:26:00 :::
 bdp
                                     3/3
                                                                    Paucity (OS).doc

                                      CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND
                                             V. G. BISHT, JJ.
                                      DATE      : 5th APRIL, 2021.
P.C. :-

. Due to paucity of time, stand over to 15 th April, 2021. Ad-interim relief granted by this Court, if any, to continue till next date.

[V. G. BISHT, J.] [R. D. DHANUKA, J.] ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/04/2021 22:26:00 :::