Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

R.Rijuraj vs Praseeda S on 13 November, 2015

Author: B. Sudheendra Kumar

Bench: B.Sudheendra Kumar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT:

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

     FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/22ND KARTHIKA, 1937

                     RPFC.No. 227 of 2012 ()
                      -----------------------
     ORDER IN MC 184/2009 OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM


    REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER:
    -------------------------------------

      R.RIJURAJ, AGED 29 YEARS,
      S/O RAJENDRAN, AISWARYA PARK VIEW
      PVRA 26 T.B. JUNCTION
      ATINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EMPLOYED AT AL-SIDRA MEDIA
      PB NO.35207, DUBAI, UAE.

      BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN

    RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:
    ----------------------

      PRASEEDA S., AGED 24 YEARS
      D/O N.SATHEESH BABU, HOUSE NO.R7, JAI NAGAR
      MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

      R1  BY ADV. SRI.S.SHYAM
      R1  BY ADV. SRI.BOBBYMATHEW KOOTHATTUKULAM
      R1  BY ADV. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN (SR.)


      THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
  ON 13-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

SCL.



                  B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
                 -------------------------------------
                     R.P.(F.C.) No. 227 of 2012
                 --------------------------------------
              Dated this the 13th day of November, 2015


                                ORDER

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has prayed for granting permission to withdraw the same.

Suffice it to say that having gone through the order impugned, I do not find any infirmity in the order impugned, warranting interference by this Court.

In the result, this R.P.(F.C.) stands dismissed. I make it clear that this order will not take away the right of the petitioner to seek remedies, if any, under law.

Sd/-

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE Scl/13.11.2015 True Copy PA to Judge