Karnataka High Court
Sri Kittanna Poojary vs Sri Shankara A Poojary on 25 October, 2023
Author: H.T. Narendra Prasad
Bench: H.T. Narendra Prasad
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:37862
MFA No. 4332 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4332 OF 2021 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI KITTANNA POOJARY
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O LATE SMT MECHU POOJARTH
AND LATE ACHANNA POOJARY
R/AT KEMMANNU DARKAS
KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE
KARAKALA TALUK AND PRESENTLY
RESIDING AT ROOM NO.4
SUMATHI SAHA NIVAS APARTMENT
SANGLI, MAHARASHTRA STATE.
2. SMT GIRIJA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
D/O LATE SMT MECHU POOJARTHI AND
D/O LATE ACHANNA POOJARY
R/AT KEMMANNU DARKAS
Digitally signed KEMMANNU NITTE VILLAGE
by
DHANALAKSHMI KAKALA TALUK
MURTHY UDUPI DISTRICT AND
Location: High PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BERMARAPADI
Court of
Karnataka BOLE VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI SHANKARA A POOJARY
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O LATE SMT MECHU POOJARTHI AND
LATE ACHANNA POOJARY
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:37862
MFA No. 4332 of 2021
R/AT KEMMANNU DARKAS
KEMMANNU NITTE VILLAGE
KARKALA TALUK
UDUPI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. LAKSHMI DEVI., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. PRASANNA V R., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC,
AGAINST THE ORDER DT.14.09.2020 PASSED ON IA NO.2 IN
O.S.NO.42/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
ACJM, KARKALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE IA NO.2 FILED
U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 SEC.151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the suit i.e., O.S.No.42/2020 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Karkala, itself has been disposed of. Hence, the appeal does not survive for consideration and the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:37862 MFA No. 4332 of 2021 Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of the dismissal of appeal, all pending I.As. are dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49