Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mahadeo Gaurishankar Kivde (Decd.Thr. ... vs Sidharam Arjun Koli@ Sidharam Kabir ... on 10 March, 2023

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

                                                                                    923-iast-32250-2022.doc
            Pallavi
           Digitally signed
           by PALLAVI
           MAHENDRA
PALLAVI    WARGAONKAR

                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MAHENDRA
WARGAONKAR Date:
           2023.03.13
           10:45:26
           +0530
                                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.32250 OF 2022
                                                                 IN
                                                   REJECTED CASE NO.1963 OF 2019

                              Mahadeo Gaurishankar Kivde (Deceased)
                              Through legal heirs
                              a)    Smt. Bhimabai Mohan Tandure and Ors.          ...Applicants
                                   Versus
                              Sidharam Arjun Koli @
                              Sidharam Kabir Kivde and Ors.                       ...Respondents

                                    Mr. Shubham E. Budhvant i/b. Mr. Vivek V. Salunke, for the
                                     Applicants.
                                    Ms. Shruti Tulpule for Respondents.

                                                               CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 10th MARCH 2023 P.C. :

1. Heard Mr. Shubham Budhvant, learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and Ms. Shruti Tulpule, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.
2. This Interim Application is taken out for condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the Second Appeal.
3. Ms. Tulpule, opposes the application. However, for the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4. Interim Application is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 1/1