Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Manu R vs State Of Karnataka By on 10 January, 2014

Author: H N Nagamohan Das

Bench: H.N. Nagamohan Das

                                   1




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

              DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014

                                BEFORE

           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS

                  CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5932/2013

BETWEEN :
---------------

1.         MANU R
           S/O. LATE C. RAMANNA
           AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

2.         MADHU R
           S/O. LATE C. RAMANNA
           AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

BOTH ARE R/A. MALIYAPPANAPALYA
DODDA MUDIGERE POST
THIPPASANDDRA HOBLI
MAGADI TALUK
RAMANAGARA DIST. 562 120.                  ... PETITIONERS

(BY Sri. M.R.C. MANOHAR, ADV.,ABSENT)

AND :
--------

1.         STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
           KUDUR POLICE STATION
           BANGALORE RURAL DIST. - 561 101.
                                       2




2.    BASAVARAJU
      S/O. CHANNABASAVAIAH
      AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
      ASSISTANT TEACHER
      RAMVILAS PASWAN HIGH
      SCHOOL, SEEGEKUPPE
      KASABA HOBLI
      MAGADI TALUK
      N/O. KEMPANAHALLI
      HULIYUR DURGA HOBLI
      R/O. KUNIGAL TALUK
      TUMKUR DIST. 572 101.                     ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SPP)

                                ---

     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
482 Cr.P.C. WITH A PRAYER TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS WHO ARE THE ACCUSED NO.
23 AND 24 IN C.C. NO. 396/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE C.J.
AND J.M.F.C., MAGADI, RAMANAGARA DIST AND ETC.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING;

                            ORDER

This is the third time the matter is appearing before the Court for non-compliance of office objections. Today when the matter was called in the first round there was no representation and the matter 3 was passed over enabling learned counsel for the petitioners to comply the office objections. Again in the post lunch session when the matter is called there is no representation. Therefore the petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE.

LRS.