Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Venkataswamy S/O Ramabhovi vs The State Of Karnataka By on 8 May, 2014

Author: A.V.Chandrashekara

Bench: A.V.Chandrashekara

                         1


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

       DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MAY 2014

                     BEFORE

 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA

       CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2595/2014

BETWEEN:

VENKATASWAMY S/O RAMABHOVI
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURIST
R/O NO.68, BHOVI COLONY
HALEBEEDU HOBLI,
BELUR TALUK,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573121            ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI R B DESHPANDE, ADV.)

AND:


THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
HALEBEEDU POLICE STATION
HASSAN DISTRICT-573121             ... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)

      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER U/S.439
CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER
PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED
TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.
NO.71/2014 OF HALEBEEDU P.S., HASSAN, FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 307 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3
AND 4 OF D.P.ACT.
                              2


     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                       ORDER

Petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.71/2014 on the file of Halebeedu P.S. of Hassan District, for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 307 IPC read with Section 34 of IPC. Consequent upon the death of the wife of the petitioner, Sections 302 and 304(B) of IPC have been invoked.

2. Wife of the first accused committed suicide by pouring kerosene on her body and thereafter igniting herself. Her dying declaration has already been recorded and it discloses that her husband is responsible for her untimely death.

3. This Court has already granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in favour of Smt.Gangamma, the wife of the present petitioner. In paragraph-7 of the order passed by this Court in Crl.P.No.1946/2014, this Court has assigned reasons as to why bail had to be 3 granted in favour of Gangamma. The present petitioner also stands in the same position and hence he is also entitled to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions as imposed in Crl.P.No.1946/2014:

i) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) and furnish one solvent surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of concerned Court.
ii) He shall not intimate or tamper with prosecution witnesses directly or indirectly.
iii) He shall appear before the concerned Court regularly.

4. It is made clear that any observation made by this Court in releasing this petitioner will not come in the way of considering the bail application that may be moved on behalf of the husband and in such an event, appropriate orders could be passed by the learned Sessions Judge uninfluenced by the order of bail 4 granted by this Court in favour of Gangamma or this petitioner.

Sd/-

JUDGE JT/-