Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Yunus Moula Mulani vs State By Cid Cyber Crime Police on 5 December, 2023

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                    -1-
                                                                  NC: 2023:KHC:44507
                                                            CRL.P No. 12273 of 2023




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                                  BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                  CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12273 OF 2023
                        BETWEEN:

                        YUNUS MOULA MULANI,
                        AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
                        S/O MOULA MULANI,
                        RESIDING AT: NO.B/10, MAHINDRA COLONY,
                        SANT DNYANESHWAR MARG,
                        NEAR GANAPATI, MANDIR,
                        SHRI KRISHN NAGAR, BORIVALI EAST,
                        MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA - 400 066.
                                                                       ...PETITIONER
                        (BY SRI. KALEEM SABIR., ADVOCATE)
                        AND:

                        1.    STATE BY C.I.D CYBER CRIME POLICE
                              BENGALURU - 560 052.
                              (SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                              AT BANGALORE - 560 001).
Digitally signed by B
K
MAHENDRAKUMAR           2.    JYOTHI LAKSHMI G,
Location: High
Court of Karnataka            D/O G.S.GANAPATHI,
                              AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
                              NO.202, 14TH STREET,
                              VINAYAKA NAGAR,
                              DEVASANDRA, K.R. PURAM,
                              BENGALURU - 560 036.
                                                                     ...RESPONDENTS
                        (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
                             THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC
                        PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE CONDITIONS NO.2 AND 3 OF THE
                        ORDER DATED 20.11.2023 ON THE FILE OF THE I A.C.M.M
                        COURT BENGALURU CITY WHICH IS ARISING OUT OF
                                  -2-
                                             NC: 2023:KHC:44507
                                       CRL.P No. 12273 of 2023




CR.NO.2/2023 OF CID CYBER CRIME POLICE AT BENGALURU
FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SEC.66C, 66D OF I.T ACT AS AN
ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                             ORDER

The petitioner had filed an application under Section 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C to defreeze the subject account stating that he is no way connected to the online account, and the account is frozen by the investigation officer on the suspicion that the accused had purchased dollars from other petitioners online in Binance APP for Rs.1,87,000/-.

2. The learned Magistrate allowed the application subject to certain terms and conditions. The petitioner is aggrieved by condition Nos.2 and 3.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the respondent-state.

4. The petitioner is neither a victim of the online fraud nor the accused who were allegedly involved in the online fraud. The police in contravention of Sub-Section 3 of Section 102 of Cr.P.C issued a notice calling upon the Bank to defreeze the account of the petitioner.

5. Learned Magistrate having allowed the application, committed an error in imposing condition Nos.2 and 3 after having directed the petitioner to execute an indemnity bond for -3- NC: 2023:KHC:44507 CRL.P No. 12273 of 2023 a sum of Rs.1,87,000/- with one surety for the likesum. Therefore, the impugned condition imposed by the learned Magistrate is arbitrary and discrimination. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER i. Criminal petition is allowed.
ii. The impugned condition Nos.2 and 3 in order dated 20.11.2023 passed by the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru City, in Cr.No.02/2023 registered by the C.I.D. Cyber Crime Police at Bengaluru on the application filed under Section 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. is hereby quashed.

iii. The other conditions imposed are remained unaltered.

Sd/-

JUDGE RKA