Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shreekanth S/O Hemanna Nadulumani vs The State Of Karnataka By Sho on 27 February, 2025

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                   -1-
                                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:3903
                                                         CRL.P No. 101061 of 2025



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                               DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
                                                BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                  CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101061 OF 2025
                      BETWEEN:
                      SHREEKANTH S/O. HEMANNA NADULUMANI,
                      AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER TRUCK,
                      R/O. 6TH WARD, NEAR DARGA,
                      THALAKALLU VILLAGE,
                      KUKUNOORU (T). KOPPAL DISTRICT.
                                                                       ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SMT. RESHMA MADIWALAR, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:
                      1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY SHO,
                           HOSPET RURAL POLICE STATION,
                           DIST VIJAYANAGARA,
                           R/BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                           DHARWAD 580011.
                      2.   AJITH KUMAR R., S/O. VASUDEV R,
                           AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. FOOD INSPECTOR,
                           R/O. TALUK, TQ. HOSAPETE,
                           DIST. VIJAYANAGARA-583201, REP. BY SPP,
                           HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
Digitally signed by        DHARWAD-580011.
R HEMALATHA                                                          ...RESPONDENTS
Location: HIGH        (BY SRI. ASHOK T.KATTIMANI, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                            THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (528
                      OF BNSS), PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN CC
                      NO.2419/2022 FOR OFFENCES U/S 3, 6(A), 7 OF THE ESSENTIAL
                      COMMODITIES ACT 1955 AND U/S 3, 4, 12, 18 OF THE KARNATAKA
                      ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM)
                      PUBLIC CONTROL ORDER 2016 AND U/S 3(2)(i), 4, 6, 8 OF
                      KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (STORAGE ACCOUNTS
                      MAINTAINING VALUE NOTIFICATION) ORDER 1981 AND U/S 420 OF
                      IPC (CRIME NO.71/2022 BEFORE HOSPET RURAL PS) AND NOW
                      PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN)
                      AND JMFC COURT AT HOSPETE IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER/SOLE
                      ACCUSED IS CONCERNED.
                                 -2-
                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:3903
                                      CRL.P No. 101061 of 2025



    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                           ORAL ORDER

Sri. Ashok T.Kattimani, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

2. The petitioner/accused, who has been charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 3, 6A, and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Sections 3, 4, 12, and 18 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Public Control Order, 2016; Sections 3(2)(i), 4, 6, and 8 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (Storage, Accounts, Maintaining Value Notification) Order, 1981; and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, is before this Court seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 2419/2022, pending on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hosapete.

3. The prosecution alleges that, upon receiving credible information that rice meant for distribution under the Public Distribution System was being transported without authorization, the complainant and his staff intercepted the vehicle and, upon inspection, found that the petitioner was transporting the rice without proper authorization.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.

5. The prosecution has annexed a copy of the FSL Report to the charge sheet. A review of the FSL Report indicates -3- NC: 2025:KHC-D:3903 CRL.P No. 101061 of 2025 that the sample of rice seized from the petitioner was of standard quality. However, the report does not state that the rice was intended for distribution under the Public Distribution System. Furthermore, the prosecution has not established that the petitioner procured the rice from a fair price shop that is authorized to distribute rice to beneficiaries. In the absence of evidence to substantiate that the rice seized from the petitioner was meant for distribution under the Public Distribution System, the continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

6. Hence, I pass the following:

ORDER
i) Accordingly, the petition is allowed.
ii) The criminal proceedings in C.C. No.2419/2022 pending on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC, Hosapete, insofar as it relates to petitioner/accused, is hereby quashed.

Pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed off accordingly.

Sd/-

(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE KMS/Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46