Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Kerala High Court

The Kerala Minerals & Metals Ltd vs The Asst.Commissioner Of Customs (Dbk) on 10 February, 2010

Author: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

Bench: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 4360 of 2010(T)


1. THE KERALA MINERALS & METALS LTD.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (DBK),
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY/JOINT SECRETARY

3. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.E.K.MADHAVAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :10/02/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
              ---------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.4360 OF 2010
              ---------------------------------------
         Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010.


                        J U D G M E N T

The petitioner namely, the Kerala Minerals & Metals Ltd., Sankaramangalam, Kollam is aggrieved by the steps taken by the 3rd respondent to enforce Exhibits P1 and P2 in spite of the fact that the petitioner has already filed a revision petition as per Exhibit P3 along with a stay petition Exhibit P4 before the 2nd respondent.

2. As per Exhibit P1 order, the petitioner was directed to remit back an amount of Rs.12,85,326/- stating that it was erroneously paid to the petitioner company. That was challenged in appeal and the said appeal was also rejected as per Exhibit P2.

3. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that in spite of the fact that the revision petition is pending, by Exhibit P6, Detention Notice has been issued and various consignments have been detained without clearance.

There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a W.P.(C) No.4360/2010 2 decision on Exhibit P3 within a period of three months after hearing a representative of the petitioner. Till then, further action pursuant to Exhibits P1, P2 and P6 will be kept in abeyance. Any goods detained pursuant to Exhibit P6 also will be released on satisfying terms and conditions for clearance, if any.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp