Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Rajendra Rajguru vs Cc (Export) Mumbai on 31 July, 2018

   IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX
            APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
            WEST ZONAL BENCH AT MUMBAI


                APPEAL NOS: C/553 & 1231/2009

[Arising out of Order-in-Original CAO No: 36/2009/CAC/CC/KS
dated 27th February 2009 passed by the Commissioner of Customs
(Adjudication), Mumbai.]


Rajendra Rajyaguru
Ashok Kejriwal                                      ... Appellants

           versus

Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication)
Mumbai                                             ...Respondent

Appearance:

Shri JC Patel, Advocate for appellants. Ms. P Vinitha Sekhar, Joint Commissioner (AR) for respondent CORAM:
Hon'ble Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) Hon'ble Shri Ajay Sharma, Member (Judicial) Date of hearing: 31/07/2018 Date of decision: 31/07/2018 ORDER NO: A/87141-87142/2018 Per: C J Mathew This appeal has been filed against order-in-original no. 36/2009/CAC/CC/KS dated 27th February 2009 of Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai which has confiscated polyester C/553 & 1231/2009 2 filament yarn and partially oriented yarn and confirmed the duty liability on the same besides imposing penalties on a number of individuals and entities.

2. Learned Counsel for appellants submits that, vide order dated 17th May 2018 in appeal no. C/510/2009 against the same impugned order, the Tribunal had remanded the matter to the original authority for compliance with the directions of the Tribunal in the earlier round of litigation and sought that these appeals should also be remanded to the original authority on the same terms.

3. Heard the Learned Authorised Representative.

4. We take notice that the findings against the two appellants are as tardy as those against the appellant in appeal no. C/510/2009 which had been remanded to enable findings on the basis of tested evidence.

5. Consequently, these two appeals are also remanded to the original authority for fresh disposal and in accordance with principles of natural justice.



                            (Pronounced in Court)


(Ajay Sharma)                                           (C J Mathew)
Member (Judicial)                                   Member (Technical)
*/as010802080808