Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 263]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Jagbir Singh vs Haryana Agricultural University on 10 July, 2014

Þ         CHAMBER MATTER                                                       SECTION IVB

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                           R.P.(C) No. 1152/2014 In SLP(C) No. 1007/2007

         JAGBIR SINGH                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                      VERSUS

         HARYANA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY & ANR                              Respondent(s)

         (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing review petition and exemption
         from filing C/C of the impugned order and oral hearing)

         Date : 10/07/2014 This petition was circulated today.

         CORAM :
                                   HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
                                   HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA

                                          By Circulation

                                UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

Application for oral hearing is rejected.

Delay condoned.

The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Deepak Mansukhani Date: 2014.07.14 16:32:37 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 1152 OF 2014 IN SLP(C) NO(s). 1007 OF 2007 JAGBIR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARYANA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY & ANR Respondent(s) O R D E R Application for oral hearing is rejected.

Delay condoned.

We have considered the averments in the review petition. Having regard to the facts and issues involved, in our opinion, no case for review is made out. There is no error in the impugned order.

Hence, the Review Petition is dismissed.

.......... ......................J. (SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA) .................................J. (DIPAK MISRA) NEW DELHI JULY 10, 2014