Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Krishna S/O Laxman Diwate vs Basappa Sidramagouda ... on 18 July, 2016

Author: A.S.Bopanna

Bench: A.S.Bopanna

                            1




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                   DHARWAD BENCH
        DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2016
                        BEFORE
        THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.S.BOPANNA

         WRIT PETITION No.109582/2014 (L-R)

BETWEEN:
1.   KRISHNA
     S/O LAXMAN DIWATE
     AGE: 65 YEARS
     R/O. SANGEETH CHAWL,
     KOULU PET, KUMBAR ONI,
     BEHIND ISHWARA DEVARA TEMPLE,
     HUBLI

2.   MAHADEVI
     W/O. VASUDEV JINDE
     AGE: 48 YEARS,
     R/O. KULKARNI GALLI,
     GANGARAM SUNAGAR CHAWL,
     BELGAUM, DIST: BELGAUM

                                      ... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI S K KAYAKAMATH, ADV.)

AND :

1.   BASAPPA SIDRAMAGOUDA
     MARIKALANAGOUDAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. BENGERI, TQ: HUBLI
     DIST: DHARWAD

2.   SAMAMMA
     D/O. SIDRAMAGOUDA MARIKALANAGOUDAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. BENGERI, TQ: HUBLI
     DIST: DHARWAD
                          2




3.   PARVATAVVA
     D/O. SIDRAMAGOUDA MARIKALANAGOUDAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. BENGERI, TQ: HUBLI
     DIST: DHARWAD

4.   GANGAVVA
     D/O. SIDRAMAGOUDA MARIKALANAGOUDAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. BENGERI, TQ: HUBLI
     DIST: DHARWAD

5.   GOURAVVA
     D/O. SIDRAMAGOUDA MARIKALANAGOUDAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. BENGERI, TQ: HUBLI
     DIST: DHARWAD

6.   RATHNAVVA
     D/O. SIDRAMAGOUDA MARIKALANAGOUDAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. BENGERI, TQ: HUBLI
     DIST: DHARWAD

7.   BASANAGOUDA
     S/O. SIDRAMAGOUDA MARIKALANAGOUDAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. BENGERI, TQ: HUBLI
     DIST: DHARWAD

8.   GANAPATI
     S/O. TOPANSA HANUMASAGAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. KUSUGAL ROAD, KESHWAPUR
     HUBLI

9.   MURALI
     S/O. TOPANSA HANUMASAGAR
     AGE: MAJOR
     R/O. KUSUGAL ROAD,
     KESHWAPUR,
     HUBLI
                               3




10.   GANGASA
      S/O. TOPANSA HANUMASAGAR
      AGE: MAJOR
      R/O. KUSUGAL ROAD,
      KESHWAPUR
      HUBLI

11.   VISHNU
      S/O. TOPANSA HANUMASAGAR
      AGE: MAJOR
      R/O. KUSUGAL ROAD,
      KESHWAPUR
      HUBLI

12.   MOHAN
      S/O. TOPANSA HANUMASAGAR
      AGE: MAJOR
      R/O. KUSUGAL ROAD,
      KESHWAPUR
      HUBLI

13.   SURESH
      S/O. VITTALSA POOJARI
      AGE: MAJOR
      R/O. MUDUGAL LAYOUT
      KESHWAPUR
      HUBLI

14.   SUMEETH
      S/O. SURESH POOJARI
      AGE: MAJOR
      R/O. MUDUGAL LAYOUT
      KESHWAPUR
      HUBLI

15.   THE LAND TRIBUNAL
      HUBLI
      DIST: DHARWAD
      BY ITS CHAIRMAN

16.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
      DHARWAD
      DIST: DHARWAD
                             4




17.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      BY ITS SECRETARY
      DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
      M S BUILDING, BANGALORE

                                         ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI S.S. NIRANJAN, ADV. FOR R1 TO 7
    SRI PRAKASH K. JAWALKAR AND
    SRI S.B. PATIL, ADV. FOR R-8 TO 14
    SRI RAVI V. HOSAMANI, AGA FOR R15-R17)


      THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO; (A) DIRECTION IN
THE    NATURE    OF    WRIT   TO  QUASH    THE    ORDER
NO.KLR.S.R.BENGERI:21 DATED 26-07-2002, THE COPY OF
WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED HEREWITH AT ANNEXURE-A.
(B) DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.16 TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST
THE ILLEGAL SALE DEED EXECUTED BY THE RESPONDENT
NO.1 TO 7 IN FAVOUR OF THE RESPONDENTS NO.8 TO 14 AND
TO DECLARE THE SAID SALE DEED AS NULL AND VOID AND
CONSEQUENTLY TO TAKE ACTION UNDER SECTION 79A AND
SECTION 80 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT AND
ETC.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                        ORDER

I.A.No.1/2016 is filed by the respondents bringing to the notice of this Court that the petitioners had assailed the very same order dated 26.07.2002 in an earlier writ petition in W.P.No.41967/2002. This Court after considering the rival contentions on merits has 5 dismissed the writ petition by the order dated 12.03.2003.

2. In the light of the same, I have perused the order passed therein and the prayer made in the instant petition. In that circumstance, the petition is barred by res judicata as the prayer has already been considered and disposed of. The instant writ petition not being maintainable, the same stands dismissed.

In view of the dismissal of the main petition, I.A.No.1/2016 appended thereto also stands disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE hrp