Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Uber India Systems Pvt Ltd vs Competition Commission Of India on 27 January, 2017

Bench: Dipak Misra, D.Y. Chandrachud

     CA 641/2017
                                                            1

     ITEM NO.35                                  COURT NO.2                       SECTION XVII

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F              I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                              Civil Appeal No.641/2017


     UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PVT LTD                                                    Appellant(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS                                       Respondent(s)

     (With appln. (s) for stay)


     Date : 27/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.


     CORAM :
                                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
                                    HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD


     For Appellant(s)                     Mr.   Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.
                                          Mr.   Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.
                                          Ms.   Pallavi S. Shroff, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Anuj Berry, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Malak Bhatt, Adv.
                                          Ms.   Prashasti Janghel, Adv.
                                          Mr.   S. S. Shroff, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                    Dr.   A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
                                          Mr.   Udayan Jain, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Sonal Jain, AOR
                                          Mr.   Manas Gaur, Adv.
                                          Ms.   Anju Thomas, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Kamal Sharma, Adv.


                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Issue notice.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by

It is submitted by Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2017.01.28 13:47:50 IST Reason: senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that notice need not be sent to the respondent Nos.3 to 6 as they are the proforma respondents. As far as the respondent No.2 is CA 641/2017 2 concerned, notice is accepted by Mr. Sonal Jain, learned counsel assisting Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel.

Let notice be issued to the respondent No.1, fixing a returnable date within two weeks.

Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

Let the matter be listed on 17th February, 2017.

Status quo, existing as on today, shall be maintained till the next date of hearing.

              (Chetan Kumar)                               (H.S. Parasher)
               Court Master                                  Court Master