Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Sujana Metal Products Ltd vs The Commercial Tax Officer (Fac) on 22 August, 2012

Author: M.Jaichandren

Bench: M.Jaichandren

       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:   22.08.2012
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
W.P.No.22165 of 2012
and M.P.No.2 of 2012

M/s.Sujana Metal Products Ltd.
Rep. by its Manager  Mr.S.Kannan	...	  	 Petitioner

          				Vs.
The Commercial Tax Officer (FAC),
Valluvarkottam Assessment Circle,
Chennai.						...		Respondent

PRAYER:	Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ in the nature of  Certiorari, calling for the impugned proceedings of the respondent in TNGST/1502596/ 2006-07 dated 01.06.2012 and to quash the same as illegal and contrary to Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
		For Petitioner	    : 	Mr.R.Hemalatha
		For Respondents	    : 	Mr.A.R.Jayaprathap
						Government Advocate (Tax)

*****

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2 The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent ought to have passed an order, for the assessment year 2006-07, accepting the returns filed by the petitioner, as per Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, read with Rule 8(8) (a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007. Instead, the respondent had passed the impugned order, dated 01.06.2012, making certain observations and by disallowing the second sales exemption claimed by the petitioner and consequently, enhancing the rate of tax payable by the petitioner.

3 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had not refuted the said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

4 In view of the above, the impugned assessment order, dated 01.06.2012, passed by the respondent, is set aside. The respondent is directed to accept the returns filed by the petitioner, for the assessment year 2006-07, and pass an appropriate order thereon, under Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, read with Rule 8(8) (a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007.

5 The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.08.2012 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/ No vaan To The Commercial Tax Officer (FAC), Valluvarkottam Assessment Circle, Chennai.

M.JAICHANDREN, J.

vaan W.P.No.22165 of 2012 and and M.P.No.2 of 2012 22.08.2012