Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Rameshwar Sharma S/O Late Shri ... vs Jaipur Development Authority on 23 May, 2019

Author: Veerendr Singh Siradhana

Bench: Veerendr Singh Siradhana

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

         S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 165/2019

                                          in

               S.B Civil Writ Petition No.11547/2017

Rameshwar Sharma S/o Late Shri Jagannath Sharma, Aged
About    42   Years,     By      Caste      Brahman         Resident    Of   Village
Chainpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur.
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
1.      Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary,
        Indira Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
2.      New Pink City Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd., Through
        Its Secretary, Shri Suresh Jain S/o Late Shri Fatehchand
        Jain, Aged About 61 Years, Secretary, New Pink City Grah
        Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd., 7 Farsoiya Market, Babu
        Bazar, Jaipur.
                                                                   ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)            :    Mr. R.A. Katta
For Respondent(s)            :



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA Order 23/05/2019 Matter comes up on the above-noted misc. application for attendance of the counsel representing the respondent No.1 - JDA, was not recorded in the order dated 8 th May, 2019, though he was present and did argue the matter.

For the reasons detailed out in the memo of the application and upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant-respondent No.1 - JDA so also looking to the fact that in the order-sheet while the matter was closed for orders; presence of Mr. R.A. Katta, (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:37:52 AM) (2 of 2) [WMAP-165/2019] Advocate, appearing for the respondent No.1 - JDA, was recorded; the misc. application merits acceptance.

Accordingly, misc. application is hereby allowed. In the order dated 8th May, 2019, presence of Mr. R.A. Katta, Advocate, shall be recorded representing respondent No.1 - JDA.

But, for the correction aforesaid, rest of the order dated 8 th May, 2019, shall be maintained as such.

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J SUNIL SOLANKI /19/65 (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:37:52 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)