Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Ku. Sunita D/O Kachruji Ramteke (Sau. ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, ... on 7 September, 2018

Author: M. G. Giratkar

Bench: B.P. Dharmadhikari, M. G. Giratkar

Order                                                                                                   0709wp3457.18
                                                            1


                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.


                                  WRIT PETITION  NO.  3457/2018.
                  Raseshkumar Atmarao Fate.   -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and others.
                                  WRIT PETITION  NO.  3454/2018.
                  Sau. Durga Dadaram Kagde.   -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and others.
                                  WRIT PETITION  NO.  3455/2018.
                 Sau. Suchita Suresh Lanjewar    -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and others.
                                  WRIT PETITION  NO.  3456/2018.
                 Ku. sanita Kachruji Ramteke .   -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and others.

Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders                                       Court's or Judge's Orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.




                                                   
                                                                CORAM  :   B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
                                                                           & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 07, 2018.

Heard Shri V.N. Patre, learned Counsel for petitioners, Shri D.P. Thakare, learned Addl.G.P. for respondent - State and Shri A.Y. Kapgate, learned Counsel for respondent Zilla Parishad.

2. Respondents state that petitions can be disposed of by adopting the course as per order dated 27.08.2018 passed in Writ Petition No. 4467/2018 and other connected matters.

::: Uploaded on - 10/09/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 11/09/2018 01:07:46 :::

Order 0709wp3457.18 2

3. Learned counsel for petitioners is not opposing the said request. He however, states that in case of petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3457/2018 (Shri Fate), the Chief Executive Officer has found substance, but, could not and did not cancel the impugned order because of pending Writ Petition.

4. Learned counsel for respondent Zilla Parishad, submits that he has no such instructions.

5. We therefore, clarify that if the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Bhandara has any reason to withdraw/cancel the impugned order in Writ Petition No. 3457/2018, it is open for him to do so.

6. Subject to this, we adopt the course followed on 27.08.2018 in Writ Petition No.4467/2018 and other connected matters. Accordingly, petitioners can file appropriate representation /appeal with the Divisional Commissioner at Nagpur, within a period of 10 days from today. If such representation/ appeal is filed, the Divisional Commissioner shall attempt to take appropriate decision upon it within further period of four weeks.

::: Uploaded on - 10/09/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 11/09/2018 01:07:46 :::

Order 0709wp3457.18 3

3. With these directions, Writ Petitions are disposed of. No cost.

                                                 JUDGE                        JUDGE

                                 Rgd.




        ::: Uploaded on - 10/09/2018                              ::: Downloaded on - 11/09/2018 01:07:46 :::