Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

C.Kasi … vs The District Collector on 22 November, 2022

Author: P.D. Audikesavalu

Bench: P.D. Audikesavalu

                                                                               W.P. No. 30433 of 2014

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 22.11.2022

                                                          CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

                                                    W.P. No. 30433 of 2014

                C.Kasi                                                              … Petitioner
                                                             -vs-
                1. The District Collector,
                  Erode District, Erode.

                2. The Joint Commissioner,
                   Hindu Religious and Endowment Department,
                   Coimbatore.

                3. The Assistant Commissioner,
                   Hindu Religious and Endowment Department,
                   Erode.

                4. The Inspector of Police,
                   Velli Tiruppur Police Station,
                   Velli Tiruppur,
                   Bhavani Taluk,
                   Erode District.

                5. Thottaiya Gowder                                              ... Respondents

                Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the First Respondent to
                consider and pass orders on merits by disposing the written representation made
                by the Petitioner on 28.10.2014 within stipulated time as this Court fixes.

                                   For Petitioner      : Mr. C.Prakasam


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/5
                                                                                   W.P. No. 30433 of 2014

                                  For Respondents : Mr. N.R.R. Arun Natarajan,
                                                    Special Government Pleader (for R2 & R3)

                                                    Mrs. N. Senthil Selvi,
                                                    Government Advocate (R1 & R4)

                                                    No appearance (for R5)

                                                        ORDER

Heard Mr. C.Prakasam, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. N.R.R. Arun Natarajan, Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Second and Third Respondents and Mrs. N.Senthil Selvi, Learned Government Advocate appearing for the First and Fourth Respondents and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2. The Writ Petition has been filed to dispose the representation dated 28.10.2014 made by the Petitioner to the First Respondent complaining that the Fifth Respondent was preventing the Petitioner from entering into his ancestral Temple, viz., Periyasamy Temple, Jarathal Village, Chennampatti Hamlet, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District.

3. Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Second and Third Respondents submits that though the said Temple is not presently under the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5 W.P. No. 30433 of 2014 administrative control of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Kumbabishegam of the said Temple had been taken place on 27.11.2014 and the idol of the Temple that had been earlier stolen has been subsequently returned. He further submits that the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Temple Entry Authorization Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) creates unfettered right to all classes of Hindus to enter any Temple for worship and the Petitioner cannot be restrained by anyone and Section 6 of the Act confers powers on the State Government to decide such dispute and if the Petitioner is prevented from entering into the Temple, he would have to avail the said remedy in that regard. Viewed from that perspective, nothing remains for further consideration in this Writ Petition and if necessity arises, the Petitioner would have to work out his rights in the aforesaid manner in accordance with law.

4. In fine, the Writ Petition is disposed with the aforesaid observations. No costs.

22.11.2022 kv Index: Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 06.12.2022. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5 W.P. No. 30433 of 2014 To

1. The District Collector, Erode District, Erode.

2. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Endowment Department, Coimbatore.

3. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Endowment Department, Erode.

4. The Inspector of Police, Velli Tiruppur Police Station, Velli Tiruppur, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5 W.P. No. 30433 of 2014 P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

kv W.P. No. 30433 of 2014 22.11.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5