Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Yashodamma And Others vs Ramesha G & Another on 4 February, 2014

Bench: N.K.Patil, Rathnakala

                         1



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

      DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014

                     :PRESENT:

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATIL

                        AND

      THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA

            MISC CVL. NO.14661 OF 2011
             IN MFA NO.4057/2011 (MV)

BETWEEN:

SMT. YASHODAMMA & OTHERS
                                       ... APPELLANTS

(BY SRI SURESH M. LATUR, ADVOCATE)

AND

RAMESHA G., & ANOTHER

                                     ... RESPONDENTS

(SRI L. SREEKANTA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

     THIS MISC. CVL. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF
THE LIMITATION ACT, PRAYING TO CONDONE THE
DELAY OF 102 DAYS IN FILING THE APPEAL IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS MISC. CVL. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, N.K. PATIL, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                             2



                        :ORDER:

The instant Misc. Cvl. application is filed for condonation of delay of 102 days in filing the appeal.

2. The delay of 102 days in filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained in the affidavit filed along with the application, sufficient cause is shown and the same is accepted.

3. Hence, for the reasons stated in the affidavit filed along with the application, Misc. Cvl. application is allowed. The delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE Sbs*