Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 48]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai

M/S Sundaram Infotech Solutions ... vs Acit Corporate Circle 6 (2), Chennai on 25 September, 2018

                 आयकर अपील य अ धकरण ,' ए ' यायपीठ,चे नई
                  IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                            "A" BENCH, CHENNAI

    ी एन. आर. एस .गणेशन, या यक सद य एवं        ी एस जयरामन, लेखा सद यके सम"
              BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
                  SHRI S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                   आयकरअपीलसं/.I.T.A. No. 1227/Chny/2018
                      नधारणवष/Assessment Year : 2007-08

M/s. Sundaram Infotech Solutions              The Assistant commissioner of
Limited,                                  Vs. Income Tax,
(Merged with Sundaram Finance Limited),       Corporate Circle 6(2),
21 Patullos Road,                             Chennai 600 034.
Chennai - 600 002.

[PAN: AAJCS 2765C]


(अपीलाथ /Appellant)                           (   यथ /Respondent)

Assessee by                               :   Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida, Advocate
Revenue by                                :   Shri G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT


 सुनवाईक$तार ख/Date of Hearing            :       30.08.2018
 घोषणाक$तार ख/Date of Pronouncement       :       25.09.2018



                                 आदे श/ O R D E R

PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Chennai in ITA No. 27/2013-14/CIT(A)-15 dated 28.12.2017 for assessment year 2007-08.

:- 2 -: ITA No. 1227/Chny/2018

2. M/s. Sundaram Infotech Solutions Limited, the assessee, is engaged in the business of software development and implementation, purchases and sales of software licences and software IT solutions. While making the assessment for assessment year 2007-08, the Assessing Officer, inter alia, disallowed the assessee's claim at Rs. 1,18,732/- made towards contribution to gratuity fund which is not an approved fund. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) did not accept the assessee's submissions and held that for claiming the deduction towards gratuity fund, it should be approved by the competent authority. Since, the said gratuity fund was not approved, he dismissed the assessee's grounds.

3. Aggrieved, the assessee filed this appeal pleading that the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated that Non-approval of the gratuity fund by the CIT could not be made basis for disallowance under section 40A(7) of the Act as this was not a mere provision within the meaning of Section 40A(7), he ought to have followed the ratio of the decision in CIT vs M/s. Textool Co. Ltd., 216 Taxman 327 wherein the Supreme Court has held that merely because the payments were made directly to the LIC the company could not be denied the benefit under section 36(1)(v), and ought to have followed the decision of the Chennai ITAT in Narasu's Spinning Mills vs. ACIT (2016) 157 ITD 512 wherein the ITAT held " Where assessee paid amount towards Employees Group Gratuity Fund to LIC and application made by assessee was still pending before Commissioner for :- 3 -: ITA No. 1227/Chny/2018 approval and assessee had no control over fund created by LIC for benefit of its employees, disallowance u/s. 36(1)(v) was not be made." and the assessee also relied on the decision of the ITAT Jodhpur in Jaisalmer Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs JCIT (2013) 158 TTJ 0001 wherein the Hon'ble Tribunal relying on the decision in CIT vs Textool Co. Ltd. (SC) held that payment made by assessee company directly to LIC towards Group Gratuity Fund is allowable even though the same is not yet approved by the CIT. Per contra, the Ld. DR supported the orders of the lower authorities.

4. We heard the rival submissions and find merit in the grounds advanced, supra, by the assessee. Since, the assessee had no control over the fund created by LIC for the benefit of its employees, disallowance u/s. 36(1)(v) was not to be made and hence, we allow the assessee's grounds of appeal.

5. In the result, the assessee's appeal is allowed.

Order pronounced on Tuesday, the 25th day of September, 2018 at Chennai.

                           Sd/-                                    Sd/-
             (एन.आर.एस .गणेशन)                                (एसजयरामन)
             (N.R.S. GANESAN)                              (S. JAYARAMAN)
        या यकसद य/Judicial Member                    लेखासद य/Accountant Member


     चे नई/Chennai,
                      th
     )दनांक/Dated:25 September , 2018
     JPV
      आदे शक$* त+ल,पअ-े,षत/Copy to:
      1. अपीलाथ//Appellant 2. *0यथ//Respondent           3. आयकरआयु1त) अपील(/CIT(A)
      4. आयकरआयु1त/CIT        5. ,वभागीय* त न ध/DR       6. गाड4फाईल/GF