Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Breach Candy Hospital Trust vs The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And ... on 15 June, 2021

Author: G. S. Kulkarni

Bench: Sunil P. Deshmukh, G. S. Kulkarni

                                                                 24wp740-21grp.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                           WRIT PETITION NO.740 OF 2021

 Breach Candy Hospital Trust                               ..Petitioner
             Versus
 The Asstt.Commissioner of Income Tax
 Exemption Circle-1 and ors..                              ...Respondents

                                       with
                           WRIT PETITION NO.1051OF 2013

 Breach Candy Hospital Trust                               ..Petitioner
            Versus
 Chief Commissioner of Income Tax                          ...Respondent

                                      with
                          WRIT PETITION NO.2462 OF 2010

 Breach Candy Hospital Trust                               ..Petitioner
            Versus
 THE Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.               ...Respondents

                                       .....

 Mr.Jehangir Mistri, Senior Advocate with Fenil Bhatt, Amit Mehta,
 Nachiket Patil i/b. Mahimtura & Co., for the Petitioner.

 Mr.Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents-Revenue.
                                 .....
                               CORAM :-       SUNIL P. DESHMUKH &
                                              G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.
                               DATE:          15 June 2021
                                        ---
 P.C.:

Amendment allowed as per the schedule in Writ Petition no.1051 of 2013. Amendment be carried out within one week from today.

PVR 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 23:22:55 :::

24wp740-21grp.doc

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners points out that pursuant to re-substituted proviso to Section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, application for re-registration is to be filed by 30 June 2021, however, having regard to the matters with regard to approval are pending litigation, the approval in the case of petitioner as required for re-registration is not possible and the application is not being received on Website/portal of the department.

3. Having regard to the pending litigation and reliefs operating, we deem it appropriate, that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the petitioner be permitted to lodge an application as per the first proviso to Section 10(23C) in paper form.

4. Needless to observe that such submission of the application by the petitioner shall be subject to the outcome of the present proceedings.

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) PVR 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 23:22:55 :::