Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Snvp Infraprojects Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax ... on 29 September, 2023

Author: B M Shyam Prasad

Bench: B M Shyam Prasad

                                       -1-
                                                    NC: 2023:KHC:35463
                                               WP No. 18572 of 2023




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                 DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

                                  BEFORE
             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
                  WRIT PETITION NO. 18572 OF 2023 (T-RES)
            BETWEEN:

            M/S SNVP INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
            (ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS M/S MHADEO
            ENGINEERING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE
            LIMITED
            REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED,

            MR. SURESH PATIL
            S/O GURAPPA FAKIRAPPA PATIL
            AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
            ADMIN OFFICE AT 189/4, WARD NO. 24 NEAR
            VEERABHADRASHWAR TEMPLE
            BASAV NAGAR, GOKAK
            BELGAVI,
            GSTIN 29AAFCM29469P1ZR

Digitally                                          ...PETITIONER
signed by
NARASIMHA   (BY SRI. PRANAY SHARMA Y., ADVOCATE)
MURTHY
VANAMALA
Location:   AND:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA   1.    ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL
                  TAX GST APPEAL -II
                  BMTC BUILDING, 4TH FLOOR,
                  ABOVE BMTC BUS STAND
                  DOMLUR,
                  OLD AIRPORT ROAD,
                  BENGALURU 560071
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2023:KHC:35463
                                      WP No. 18572 of 2023




2.   SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX
     RANGE -CND-04, NORTH DIVISION -4
     BENGALURU GST NORTH COMMISSIONERATE
     NO. 16/1, I FLOOR, S P COMPLEX,
     LALBAGH ROAD,
     BEGNALURU URBAN 560027
                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)

      THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING ORDER IN APPEAL
BEARING NO. 161/2023-24/ADC-AII/GST PASSED ON
09/08/2023 AT ANNX-G AND DIRECT R2 TO REVOKE
THE CANCELLATION OF GST REGISTRATION OF THE
PETITIONER (ANNEXURE-A).

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:


                      ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved by the Order-in- Appeal dated 09.08.2023 in No.161/2023-24/ADC- AII/GST [Annexure-G], and the first respondent by this impugned order has confirmed the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration vide order dated 25.02.2023 by the second respondent. The first -3- NC: 2023:KHC:35463 WP No. 18572 of 2023 respondent has primarily rejected the petitioner's appeal as against the aforesaid order dated 25.02.2023 on the ground that the appeal is filed beyond permitted time period.

2. The petitioner contends that, with the entrustment of certain work by M/s. KIADB in the year 2013 and the belated commencement of the contracted work, the petitioner has engaged the services of M/s. Sham Earth Movers. The petitioner has dues applicable till the month of January 2023, but the petitioner contends that, because the Input Tax Credit [ITC] was not reflected in the GST portal, it did not file Return under the bonafide belief that he could await the portal reflecting the ITC.

3. The petitioner, insofar as the delay in filing the appeal, without elaboration has pleaded bonafides to say the petitioner has employed number of persons and the enterprise would be brought to a standstill with many loosing employment -4- NC: 2023:KHC:35463 WP No. 18572 of 2023 opportunities despite the fact that the petitioner is willing to file returns, pay all the dues availing ITC.

4. Sri. Pranay Sharma Y., the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, the learned standing counsel for the respondents, are heard for final disposal in the light of the aforesaid circumstances which remain mostly undisputed, and also in the light of the fact that where bonafides are demonstrated, this Court, in similar circumstances, has called upon the concerned to revoke the cancellation on terms such as that consequent to revocation of the GST cancellation, the concerned assessee must file Books of Returns and tender all admitted dues within a reasonable time. Sri. Pranay Sharma Y. submits that the second respondent will have to pass orders for revocation of the cancellation of GST and that the petitioner will not have any liability because he has a credit to a tune of more than Rs.4,00,000/-, and in any event, all permissible -5- NC: 2023:KHC:35463 WP No. 18572 of 2023 dues will be paid. In the light of the foregoing and in the interest of justice, the following:

ORDER
a) The petition is allowed.
   b) The      second       respondent            -      the

      Superintendent        of      Central        Tax     -

notwithstanding the impugned Order-in-

Appeal dated 09.08.2023 [Annexure-G], is called upon to revoke the cancellation of GST vide order dated 25.02.2023 on the condition that the petitioner shall within two [2] weeks file all Returns and discharge any dues that may be outstanding.

c) It is needless to observe that if the petitioner does not file Books of Returns within time now allowed upon the revocation of the GST cancellation, the second respondent shall cancel the GST -6- NC: 2023:KHC:35463 WP No. 18572 of 2023 registration in accordance with law.

Sd/-

JUDGE RB