Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Gautam Kumar Bordoloi And Anr vs Upakul Bordoloi And 7 Ors on 8 May, 2019

Author: Prasanta Kumar Deka

Bench: Prasanta Kumar Deka

                                                                Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010084472019




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : CRP 66/2019

         1:GAUTAM KUMAR BORDOLOI AND ANR.
         S/O LT. SARADA KANTA BORDOLOI, R/O KAMALA KANTA ENCLAVE, FLAT
         NO. 3(B), THIRD FLOOR, OPPOSITE BHARAT PETROL PUMP, HOUSE NO.
         175, KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI-781022, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM

         2: GORIMA BORDOLOI
         W/O LT. ROHINI KUMAR BORDOLOI
          R/O CHANDMARI COLONY
          NIZARAPARA
          CHANDMARI
          GUWAHATI-781003
          KAMRUP (M)
         ASSA

         VERSUS

         1:UPAKUL BORDOLOI AND 7 ORS.
         S/O LT. SARADA KANTA BORDOLOI, R/O RUKMANI NAGAR, BIHU FIELD,
         HOUSE NO.-5, SECOND FLOOR, KHANAPARA-781022, GUWAHATI,
         KAMRUP (M), ASSAM

         2:ALAKJYOTI BORDOLOI
          S/O LT. SARADA KANTA BORDOLOI
          R/O HOUSE NO. 69 JANAKPUR NEAR DPI OFFICE
          KAHILIPARA
          GUWAHATI-781019
          KAMRUP (M)
         ASSAM

         3:DIPIKA BORDOLOI
         W/O BRRINCHI HAZARIAK
          R/O BINAYAK APARTMENT
          SECOND FLOOR
          OPPOSITE FARM GATE
                                                    Page No.# 2/4

             KHANAPARA-781022
             GUWAHATI
             KAMRUP (M)
             ASSAM

            4:BANDINI BORDOLOI
            W/O SRI LUHIT NARAYAN KONWAR
             R/O BINAYAK APARTMENT
             SECOND FLOOR
             OPPOSITE FARM GATE
             KHANAPARA-781022
             GUWAHATI
             KAMRUP (M)
            ASSAM

            5:SANDEEP AGARWAL
             S/O SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR AGARWAL
             C/O- AGARWAL AUTOMOBILE JANIGANJ
             SILCHAR-788001
            ASSAM

            6:BINOD AGARWAL
             S/O SRI BADRI PRASAD AGARWAL
             C/O AGARWAL AUTOMOBILE JANIGANJ
             SILCHAR-788001
            ASSAM

            7:VIJAY AGARWAL
             S/O SRI BADRI PRASAD AGARWAL
             C/O AGARWAL AUTOMOBILE JANIGANJ
             SILCHAR-788001
            ASSAM

            8:BIMAL AGARWAL
             S/O SRI BADRI PRASAD AGARWAL
             C/O AGARWAL AUTOMOBILE JANIGANJ
             SILCHAR-788001
            ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. R C SANCHATI

Advocate for the Respondent :
                                                                                   Page No.# 3/4




                                     BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA

                                             ORDER

08.05.2019 Heard Mr. R. C. Sanchati, the learned counsel for the petitioners.

In this revision petition order dated 08.03.2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge No.3, Kamrup(M) at Guwahati in Title Suit No.128/2010 is put under challenge.

Let notice be issued to the respondents.

The petitioners shall take steps on the respondents within a period of 3(three) days from today both by way of Registered post with A/D and usual process returnable on 19.06.2019.

The present petitioners as the plaintiffs filed Title Suit No.128/2010 against the present pro-forma respondent Nos.3 to 8. The principal respondents in this petition where the plaintiff Nos.2 and 3 in the said suit. The suit proceeded after the pro-forma respondents as the defendants contested by filing the petition. Evidence was also over and the suit was fixed for its judgment. On 09.05.2018 the present principal respondents jointly filed one application under Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC seeking for striking out of the names as plaintiff Nos. 2 and 3 and implead them as defendants. The grounds for such prayer were the present petitioners without their consent had shown them as the plaintiffs in the suit and belatedly they could come to know from the pro-forma respondent No.3, Dipika Bordoloi about pendency of the suit purportedly shown to be filed by them. Though the plaintiffs/petitioners objected however vide impugned order dated 08.03.2019 the learned court below by way of the impugned order that too in a cryptic manner allowed their petition directing the Bench Assistant to transpose the present principal respondents from plaintiffs to defendants. Not only that the suit is fixed on 27.05.2019 for filing written statement by the newly added defendant Nos. 7 and 8 i.e. the principal respondents in this petition. The issue before this court requires further examination and as such, further proceeding in Title Suit No.128/2010 Page No.# 4/4 pending in the court of learned Civil Judge No.3, Kamrup(M) at Guwahati is stayed till the disposal of this revision petition.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant