Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Prasannakumar vs The District Collector on 3 March, 2026

Author: N.Sathish Kumar

Bench: N.Sathish Kumar

                                                                                      W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED :03.03.2026

                                                        CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
                                                 AND
                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

                                         W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026
                                                   and
                                     W.M.P(MD) Nos.4858 & 4860 of 2026

                     Prasannakumar                                                    ... Petitioner

                                                        Vs

                     1. The District Collector,
                     Collector Office,
                     Ramanathapuram District.

                     2. The Commissioner (HR and CE),
                     Hindu and Charitable Endowment Board,
                     No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
                     Nungambakkam,
                     Chennai - 600 034.

                     3. The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer (HR and CE),
                     Arul Migu Sri Ramanathaswamy Thirukovil,
                     Rameswaram,
                     Ramanathapuram District.                         ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the
                     records in ve.Aa.No.14/2026/Sema ThoA/Ramanathapuram/dated
                     27.02.2026 on the file of the third respondent and quash the same as


                     1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 09/03/2026 06:27:03 pm )
                                                                                             W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026


                     illegal.


                                          For Petitioner                : Mr. R. Jegadeeswaran

                                          For R1                        : Mr. J.Ashok
                                                                          Additional Government Pleader
                                          For R2                        : Mr.Veerakathiravan
                                                                          Additional Advocate General
                                                                          Asst. by Mr. J.Ashok
                                                                          Additional Government Pleader
                                          For R3                        : Mr.S.Ramesh


                                                           ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The present writ petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in ve.Aa.No.14/2026/Sema ThoA/Ramanathapuram, dated 27.02.2026 on the file of the third respondent.

2. According to the petitioner, he is the devotee of the Arul Migu Sri Ramanathaswamy Thirukovil and the third respondent has issued a public tender notice in the daily newspaper including the proceedings for engaging cameras. The same has been challenged mainly on the ground that the respondents failed to consider that the devotees are taking bath in the holy water in the well situated inside the temple. Despite the ban of 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/03/2026 06:27:03 pm ) W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026 cellphone usage, now the cameras have been permitted. According to him, if the cameras are allowed, that will spoil the sanctity of the temple.

Hence, he challenged the impugned order.

3. The learned Additional Advocate General, on instructions, submits that since the cellphone usage has been totally banned, the devotees from all over the countries wish to take photographs inside the temple for their memory of visiting the temple. Hence, the Government has decided to engage cameramen for taking photographs for the devotees in three places inside the temple, where there are no religious activities carried out, viz., (1) the southern side of the third praharam, (2) the thirukalyana mandabam situated in front of the Ambal Sannath and (3) the eastern side of the Rajagopuram.

4. It is further contended that the photographs will be taken by the persons engaged by the temple only in these three places, where there are no religious activities carried out and hence, the same will not affect the sanctity of the temple. Only in order to avoid any contrary usage of 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/03/2026 06:27:03 pm ) W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026 cellphones inside the temple, the three places have been earmarked for taking photographs.

5. Heard both sides and perused the records.

6. We are of the view that taking photographs in the above earmarked places will not affect the sanctity of the temple. However, we make it clear that the photographs should be taken only in the places identified and earmarked by the temple and the cameramen should not be allowed inside the temple and only if the devotees voluntarily come to take photographs, the cameramen may provide service for the devotees.

7. With the said observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

                     NCS : Yes/No                                        [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.]
                     Index : Yes / No                                             04.03.2026
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     apd




                     4/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 09/03/2026 06:27:03 pm )
                                                                                      W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026



                     To
                     1. The District Collector,
                     Collector Office,
                     Ramanathapuram District.

                     2. The Commissioner (HR and CE),
                     Hindu and Charitable Endowment Board,
                     No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
                     Nungambakkam,
                     Chennai - 600 034.

3. The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer (HR and CE), Arul Migu Sri Ramanathaswamy Thirukovil, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District.

5/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/03/2026 06:27:03 pm ) W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

apd ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No. 5826 of 2026 03.03.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/03/2026 06:27:03 pm )