Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Gayatri D/O Ramsunder Dubey vs Army Welfare Education Society(Awes) on 2 March, 2026

                                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




                           C/SCA/22877/2017                                 ORDER DATED: 02/03/2026

                                                                                                           undefined




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                   R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22877 of 2017

                     ==========================================================
                                       GAYATRI D/O RAMSUNDER DUBEY
                                                   Versus
                                ARMY WELFARE EDUCATION SOCIETY(AWES) & ORS.
                     ==========================================================
                     Appearance:
                     MR DG CHAUHAN(218) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                     RONAK D CHAUHAN(7709) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                     MR YOGEN N PANDYA(5766) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
                     RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 5
                     ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT

                                                        Date : 02/03/2026

                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. After arguing for some time, Mr. D. G. Chauhan, learned Advocate for the petitioner, under the instructions of his client, does not press the present petition with a view to avail other alternative remedies in regard to seeking relief as prayed in this petition.

2. Per contra, Mr. Yogen N. Pandya, learned Advocate for the respondents, has no objection against such request.

3. Permission as sought for is granted.

4. It is made clear that this Court has neither gone into nor examined the merits of the case.

Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by MR. NILESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PARMAR(HCD0068) on Mon Mar 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Mar 09 20:41:05 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/22877/2017 ORDER DATED: 02/03/2026 undefined

5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Rule discharged. No order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith.

(MAULIK J.SHELAT,J) NILESH Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by MR. NILESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PARMAR(HCD0068) on Mon Mar 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Mar 09 20:41:05 IST 2026