Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Louis Berger Sas vs Maharashtra State Road Development ... on 25 April, 2022

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere, Madhav J. Jamdar

   Sonali                                                              504-oswpl-13281-2022.doc



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
         Digitally
         signed by
         SONALI
SONALI   MILIND
         PATIL
                                        WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 13281 OF 2022
MILIND
PATIL    Date:
         2022.04.27
         09:46:47
         +0530        Louis Berger SAS                                     ...Petitioner
                          Versus
                      Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation
                      Limited                                               ...Respondent

                                                    WITH
                                    INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 13371 OF 2022
                                                      IN
                                       WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 13281 OF 2022

                      Louis Berger SAS                                     ...Applicant
                          Versus
                      Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation
                      Limited                                               ...Respondent


                      Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. B. Ramakrishnan, i/b Akash
                      Menon, for the Petitioner.

                      Mr. Pankaj Sawant, Senior Advocate a/w Muthahar Khan & Kenneth
                      Agastin, i/b Bulwork Solicitors, for the Respondent-MSRDC.


                                                 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                         MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.

DATED : 25th APRIL 2022 P.C. :

1. Not on board. Taken on board.
1/3
Sonali 504-oswpl-13281-2022.doc
2. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner.
3. The grievance of the petitioner in the aforesaid petition is, that, the respondent has issued fresh tenders in January-2022, with respect to the same scope of work, as awarded to the petitioner in 2017.
4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that even after the fresh tender was issued, the respondent-authority continued its correspondence with the petitioner, post the same. Learned counsel in support of his submission relied on the correspondence which is from page 39 onwards. He submits that the respondent-authority could not have issued fresh tender with respect of the same scope of work, awarded to the petitioner, without terminating the petitioner's contract.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent states that he has been served with a copy of the petition only at 1.00 p.m. today. He seeks time to file affidavit-in-reply and to take instructions. The said affidavit-in-reply to be filed in the Registry of this Court on or before 2 nd May 2022 with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2/3
Sonali 504-oswpl-13281-2022.doc
6. Stand over to 4th May 2022 at 2.30 p.m.
7. In the meantime, till the next date, the respondent shall not issue any work order, with respect to the subject tender.
8. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
         MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.                          REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.




                                          3/3